Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38427680›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Awake tracheal intubation in routine airway management: A retrospective analysis in a tertiary centre.

Nina Pirlich, Alexander Berk, Regina Hummel, Irene Schmidtmann, Katharina Epp, Marc Kriege, Eva Wittenmeier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nina PirlichDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7741-2885
Alexander BerkDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Regina HummelDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Irene SchmidtmannInstitute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Katharina EppDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Marc KriegeDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7350-7908
Eva WittenmeierDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhile awake tracheal intubation (ATI) is regarded as the gold standard for difficult airway management according to current guidelines, there seems to be a reluctance in its application. This retrospective cohort study, conducted at a German tertiary hospital over a 2-year period, aimed to demonstrate that integrating awake tracheal intubation using flexible bronchoscopy (ATI:FB) into routine airway management makes it a successful and safe approach. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn 2019 and 2020, records from the data acquisition system (DAQ) and archived anesthesia records were screened to evaluate the specifics of ATI:FB procedures, focusing on overall success and safety. Analysis included complications, time required for ATI:FB, and potential influencing factors such as patient characteristics, indication, medical/operative specialty, sedation technique, route and experience of anesthesiologist. Logistic regression assessed the impact of various variables on occurrence of complications and linear regression, with log(time) as the dependent variable, evaluated median time required to perform ATI:FB.

resultsATI:FB constituted 4.3 % (n = 1,911) of all airway management procedures, predominantly observed in dental, oral, and maxillofacial surgery (46.5 %) and otorhinolaryngology (38.4 %). The success rate for ATI:FB was notably high at 99.6 %, with only 5.4 % of cases experiencing complications, including technical issues, agitation, and visibility obstruction due to mucous secretion. Complication risk was influenced by the medical specialty and the experience of the anesthesiologist. A strong effect was observed in otorhinolaryngology (OR = 4.54, 95 % CI [1.64; 14.06]). The median time required for ATI:FB was 16 minutes (IQR: 11 to 23), with factors such as indication (p < 0.0001), experience of anesthesiologist (p < 0.0001), sedation technique (p = 0.0408), priority of the procedure (p = 0.0134), and medical/operative specialty (p < 0.0001) affecting the duration. The median time required for ATI:FB differed significantly based on the experience of the anesthesiologist (p < 0.0001).

conclusionATI:FB proves successful and safe, with low complications and manageable procedural time. Experience of the anesthesiologist is a modifiable factor enhancing safety, emphasizing the need for ATI:FB integration into routine airway management.

Indexed as

Intubation, IntratrachealWakefulnessAirway ManagementHumansRetrospective StudiesTrachea

Identifiers

PMID38427680
PMCPMC10906896
OpenAlexW4392388568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.