ArticlePloS one2024
Electronic medical record implementation in the emergency department in a low-resource country: Lessons learned.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large language models for post-discharge follow-up in erectile dysfunction care: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Review
- Improving Rural Healthcare in Mobile Clinics: Real-Time, Live Data Entry into the Electronic Medical Record Using a Satellite Internet Connection.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular Imaging in the Era of Precision Medicine: Insights from Advanced Technologies - A Narrative Review.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Barriers to Pediatric Emergency Care in Low-Resource Settings: A Narrative Review.Sage open pediatricsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThere is paucity of information regarding electronic medical record (EMR) implementation in emergency departments in countries outside the United States especially in low-resource settings. The objective of this study is to describe strategies for a successful implementation of an EMR in the emergency department and to examine the impact of this implementation on the department's operations and patient-related metrics.
methodsWe performed an observational retrospective study at the emergency department of a tertiary care center in Beirut, Lebanon. We assessed the effect of EMR implementation by tracking emergency departments' quality metrics during a one-year baseline period and one year after implementation. End-user satisfaction and patient satisfaction were also assessed.
resultsOur evaluation of the implementation of EMR in a low resource setting showed a transient increase in LOS and visit-to-admission decision, however this returned to baseline after around 6 months. The bounce-back rate also increased. End-users were satisfied with the new EMR and patient satisfaction did not show a significant change.
conclusionsLessons learned from this successful EMR implementation include a mix of strategies recommended by the EMR vendor as well as specific strategies used at our institution. These can be used in future implementation projects in low-resource settings to avoid disruption of workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.