ArticlePloS one2024
Prognostic value of PRR11 and immune cell infiltration in Ewing sarcoma.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- EWS-RNA Binding Protein 1: Structural Insights into Ewing Sarcoma by Conformational Dynamics Investigations.Current cancer drug targets · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ewing's sarcoma (ES) is the second most common bone and soft tissue malignancy in children and adolescents with a poor prognosis. The identification of genes with prognostic value may contribute to the prediction and treatment of this disease. The GSE17679, GSE68776, GSE63155, and GSE63156 datasets were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database and qualified. Prognostic value of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the normal and tumor groups and immune cell infiltration were explored by several algorithms. A prognostic model was established and validated. Finally, functional analyses of the DEGs were performed. Proline rich 11 (PRR11) and mast cell infiltration were noted as the key indicators for the prognosis of ES. Kaplan-Meier and scatter plots for the training and two validation sets showed that patients in the low-PRR11 expression group were associated with better outcomes than those in the high-PRR11 expression group. The concordance indices and calibration analyses of the prognostic model indicated good predictive accuracy in the training and validation sets. The area under the curve values obtained through the receiver operating characteristic analysis for 1-, 3-, 5-year prediction were ≥ 0.75 in the three cohorts, suggesting satisfactory sensitivity and specificity of the model. Decision curve analyses suggested that patients could benefit more from the model than the other strategies. Functional analyses suggested that DEGs were mainly clustered in the cell cycle pathway. PRR11 and mast cell infiltration are potential prognostic indicators in ES. PRR11 possibly affects the prognosis of patients with ES through the cell cycle pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.