Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38427633›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2024

Ten simple rules for pushing boundaries of inclusion at academic events.

Siobhan Mackenzie Hall, Daniel Kochin, Carmel Carne, Patricia Herterich, Kristen Lenay Lewers, Mohamed Abdelhack, Arun Ramasubramanian, Juno Felecia Michael Alphonse, Visotheary Ung, Sara El-Gebali and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Siobhan Mackenzie HallNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1520-4220
Daniel KochinCentre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3468-8221
Carmel CarneIndependent Researcher, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6228-8802
Patricia HerterichIndependent Researcher, Cape Town, South Africa.
Kristen Lenay LewersInformation Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Mohamed AbdelhackKrembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6753-3237
Arun RamasubramanianIndependent Researcher, Cape Town, South Africa.
Juno Felecia Michael AlphonseDepartment of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Visotheary UngISYEB UMR 7205 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, MNHN, SU, EPHE-PSL, UA. Botanique, Paris, France.
Sara El-GebaliSciLifeLab-Data Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.
Christopher Brian CurrinInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4809-5059
Esther PlompFaculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3625-1357
Rachel ThompsonCentre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6332-545X
Malvika SharanOLS (formerly Open Life Science), Wimblington, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6619-7369

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inclusion at academic events is facing increased scrutiny as the communities these events serve raise their expectations for who can practically attend. Active efforts in recent years to bring more diversity to academic events have brought progress and created momentum. However, we must reflect on these efforts and determine which underrepresented groups are being disadvantaged. Inclusion at academic events is important to ensure diversity of discourse and opinion, to help build networks, and to avoid academic siloing. All of these contribute to the development of a robust and resilient academic field. We have developed these Ten Simple Rules both to amplify the voices that have been speaking out and to celebrate the progress of many Equity, Diversity, and Inclusivity practices that continue to drive the organisation of academic events. The Rules aim to raise awareness as well as provide actionable suggestions and tools to support these initiatives further. This aims to support academic organisations such as the Deep Learning Indaba, Neuromatch Academy, the IBRO-Simons Computational Neuroscience Imbizo, Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG), Arabs in Neuroscience, FAIRPoints, and OLS (formerly Open Life Science). This article is a call to action for organisers to reevaluate the impact and reach of their inclusive practices.

Identifiers

PMID38427633
PMCPMC10906823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.