Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38427591›Full record

ArticleACS macro letters2024

Cooperative Dynamics of Highly Entangled Linear Polymers within the Entanglement Tube.

Margarita Kruteva, Jürgen Allgaier, Michael Monkenbusch, Rustem Valiullin, Ingo Hoffmann, Dieter Richter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS macro letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Margarita KrutevaJülich Centre for Neutron Science (JCNS-1) and Institute for Biological Information Processing (IBI-8), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428 Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7686-0934
Jürgen AllgaierJülich Centre for Neutron Science (JCNS-1) and Institute for Biological Information Processing (IBI-8), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428 Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9276-597X
Michael MonkenbuschJülich Centre for Neutron Science (JCNS-1) and Institute for Biological Information Processing (IBI-8), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428 Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6733-832X
Rustem ValiullinFelix Bloch Institute for Solid State Physics, Leipzig University, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5028-7642
Ingo HoffmannInstitut Laue-Langevin (ILL), 71 avenue des Martyrs, 38000 Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7178-6467
Dieter RichterJülich Centre for Neutron Science (JCNS-2) and Peter Grünberg Institute (PGI-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428 Jülich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a quantitative comparison of the dynamic structure factors from unentangled and strongly entangled poly(butylene oxide) (PBO) melts. As expected, the low molecular weight PBO displays Rouse dynamics, however, with very significant subdiffusive center-of-mass diffusion. The spectra from high molecular weight entangled PBO can be very well described by the dynamic structure factor based on the concept of local reptation, including the Rouse dynamics within the tube and allowing for non-Gaussian corrections. Comparing quantitatively the spectra from both polymers leads to the surprising result that their spectra differ only by the contribution of classical Rouse diffusion for the low molecular weight melt. The subdiffusive component is common for both the low and high molecular weight PBO melts, indicating that in both melts the same interchain potential is active, thereby supporting the validity of the Generalized Langevin Equation approach.

Identifiers

PMID38427591
PMCPMC10956489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.