Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38427292›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Sampling and Extraction of Plant Parasitic Nematodes.

Nicola Greco, Renato Crozzoli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicola GrecoInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Bari, Italy.
Renato CrozzoliInstitute of Agriculture Zoology, Central University of Venezuela (UCV), Maracay, Venezuela.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of nematodes requires availability of nematode specimens and their population densities in plants and soil. This can be achieved using adequate sampling schemes and extraction methods. In this chapter, the most common and suitable sampling and extraction procedures and equipment are described. These include the use of Baermann's funnels, Cobb's decanting and sieving, floating methods such as the Oostenbrink method and Fenwick can, elutriators such as Seinhorst methods, centrifugation methods including that of Coolen, and mechanical and enzymatic maceration. The combination of different methods for cleaning the nematode suspensions is described, such as Cobb's sieving with Baermann's funnels or centrifugation, and for cysts combining Seinhorst's elutriator or Fenwick can with the alcohol methods. Methods for extraction of eggs and/or juveniles of cyst and egg mass forming nematodes, to be used as inoculum or to ascertain egg viability, are also described. Only little information is also noted on the use of molecular tools to identify and quantify nematode populations in soil and roots.

Indexed as

NematodaTylenchidaAnimalsPlant RootsPlantsSoilSoilElutriatorsExtraction methodsFloating apparatusMechanical and enzymatic macerationNematode extractionNematode sampling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.