Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38427184›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Blood-Based Biomarkers for Early Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis in Real-World Settings.

Robert Perneczky, Niels Hansen, Anna Hofmann, Christoph Laske, Josef Priller, Timo Grimmer, Lutz Frölich, Emrah Düzel, Frank Jessen, Jens Wiltfang and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
30.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Amyloid β-Induced Inflammarafts in Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Robert PerneczkyDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany. robert.perneczky@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Niels HansenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Anna HofmannHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Christoph LaskeGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Josef PrillerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Timo GrimmerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lutz FrölichDepartment of Geriatric Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Emrah DüzelInstitute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research (IKND), Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Frank JessenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany.
Jens WiltfangDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
German Network Memory Clinics – Diagnostic Tools Working Group
Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEHeidelberg University · DEMunich Cluster for Systems Neurology · DEOtto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As our knowledge about the biology of Alzheimer's disease (AD) expands and we recognize the significance of early intervention for effective treatment, there is a shift in focus toward detecting the disease at an early stage. AD is characterized by the accumulation of misfolded amyloid-β (Aβ) and phosphorylated tau proteins in the brain, leading to the formation of senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. While a definitive diagnosis of AD can only be confirmed through autopsy by examining these pathological features, there are now reliable methods available for diagnosing the disease in living individuals. These methods involve analyzing cerebrospinal fluid and using positron emission tomography to accurately assess the presence of Aβ and tau proteins. While these diagnostic markers have shown high accuracy in memory-clinic populations, they do have limitations such as the requirement for invasive lumbar puncture or exposure to ionizing radiation. Additionally, they are not easily accessible outside of specialized healthcare settings. Blood-based biomarkers of the core pathological features of AD are being developed, showing promise for less invasive, scalable identification of AD cases in the community. The advantages for the healthcare systems of this development are obvious, but the diagnostic performance of blood-based biomarkers in broader, non-selected populations outside of retrospective analyses and research cohorts still requires further investigation, including the combination with more effective neuropsychological assessments such as digital cognitive test solutions.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersHumansRetrospective Studiestau ProteinsAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkerstau ProteinsEarly and targeted treatment and prevention of neurodegenerationEarly diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease and dementiaPatient and service user valueScalable diagnostic technologiesSubjective cognitive impairment and mild cognitive impairment

Identifiers

PMID38427184
OpenAlexW4392399286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.