Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38427145›Full record

ArticleHepatology international2024

Pre-hepatectomy dynamic circulating tumor DNA to predict pathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy and post-hepatectomy recurrence in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Ming Liu, Quan Bao, Tingting Zhao, Longfei Huang, Danhua Zhang, Yanyan Wang, Xiaoluan Yan, Hongwei Wang, Kemin Jin, Wei Liu and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ming Liu *Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery I, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-4495-4992
Quan Bao *Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery I, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Tingting ZhaoGloriousMed Clinical Laboratory (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Longfei HuangGloriousMed Clinical Laboratory (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Danhua ZhangGloriousMed Clinical Laboratory (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yanyan WangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery I, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoluan YanKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery I, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Hongwei WangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery I, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Kemin JinKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery I, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Wei LiuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery I, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Kun WangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery I, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, People's Republic of China. Wang-kun@vip.sina.com.
Baocai XingKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery I, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 52, Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, People's Republic of China. xingbaocai88@sina.com.
Peking University · CN

Funding

Clinical Research Fund For Distinguished Young Scholars of Beijing Cancer Hospital LGH2022005National Nature Science Foundation of China 31971192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the predictive value of pre-hepatectomy dynamic circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) on pathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy and recurrence after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).

backgroundPathologic response is a predictor of clinical outcomes for patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM. Postoperative ctDNA has been proven to be sensitive for recurrence detection. However, few studies investigate the impact of pre-hepatectomy ctDNA on pathologic response and recurrence.

methodsPatients with potential resectable CRLM underwent preoperative chemotherapy and hepatectomy between 2018 and 2021 was considered for inclusion. Plasma ctDNA was collected before and after preoperative chemotherapy. Pathologic response was analyzed for all patients after liver resection. Recurrence free survival was compared between patients with different ctDNA status and different pathologic response. The relation between ctDNA and pathologic response was also analyzed.

resultsA total of 114 patients were included. ctDNA was detectable in 108 of 114 patients (94.7%) before chemotherapy, in 56 of 114 patients (49.1%) after chemotherapy. Patients with ctDNA positive at baseline and negative after chemotherapy had significantly longer RFS (median RFS 17 vs 7 months, p = 0.001) and HRFS (median HRFS unreached vs 8 months, p < 0.001) than those with ctDNA persistently positive after chemotherapy. Two patients (1.6%) had a pathologic complete response and 56 patients (45.2%) had a pathologic major response. Post-chemotherapy ctDNA- was associated with improved major pathologic response (53.4% vs 32.1%, p = 0.011). In the multivariable analysis, ctDNA- after chemotherapy (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.93), major pathologic response (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.19-0.62) and surgery combined with radiofrequency ablation (HR 2.62, 95% CI 1.38-5.00) were independently associated with RFS (all p < 0.05).

conclusionsPre-hepatectomy dynamic monitoring of ctDNA could predict pathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy and post-hepatectomy recurrence in CRLM patients. Negative ctDNA after preoperative chemotherapy was associated with better tumor regression grade and recurrence-free survival, which might be used to guide pre-hepatectomy chemotherapy and predict prognosis.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNAColorectal NeoplasmsHepatectomyLiver NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNACirculating tumor DNAColorectal liver metastasesHepatectomyPathologic responseRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID38427145
OpenAlexW4392365827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.