Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38427066›Full record

ReviewPathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Development and progress of the National Autopsy Network (NATON)].

Svenja Windeck, Kristina Allgoewer, Saskia von Stillfried, Lucas Triefenbach, Ulrike Nienaber, Roman David Bülow, Rainer Röhrig, Benjamin Ondruschka, Peter Boor, NATON

Open access · hybridAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Svenja WindeckInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, Aachen, Deutschland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7963-8344
Kristina AllgoewerInstitut für Rechtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4984-6413
Saskia von StillfriedInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, Aachen, Deutschland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5260-8494
Lucas TriefenbachInstitut für Medizinische Informatik, Universitätsklinikum RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, Aachen, Deutschland.
Ulrike NienaberInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, Aachen, Deutschland.
Roman David BülowInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, Aachen, Deutschland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8527-7353
Rainer RöhrigInstitut für Medizinische Informatik, Universitätsklinikum RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, Aachen, Deutschland.
Benjamin OndruschkaInstitut für Rechtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8277-6616
Peter BoorInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, Aachen, Deutschland. pboor@ukaachen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9921-4284
NATON
Universitätsklinikum Aachen · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutopsies have long been considered the gold standard for quality assurance in medicine, yet their significance in basic research has been relatively overlooked. The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the potential of autopsies in understanding pathophysiology, therapy, and disease management. In response, the German Registry for COVID-19 Autopsies (DeRegCOVID) was established in April 2020, followed by the DEFEAT PANDEMIcs consortium (2020-2021), which evolved into the National Autopsy Network (NATON). DEREGCOVID: DeRegCOVID collected and analyzed autopsy data from COVID-19 deceased in Germany over three years, serving as the largest national multicenter autopsy study. Results identified crucial factors in severe/fatal cases, such as pulmonary vascular thromboemboli and the intricate virus-immune interplay. DeRegCOVID served as a central hub for data analysis, research inquiries, and public communication, playing a vital role in informing policy changes and responding to health authorities. NATON: Initiated by the Network University Medicine (NUM), NATON emerged as a sustainable infrastructure for autopsy-based research. NATON aims to provide a data and method platform, fostering collaboration across pathology, neuropathology, and legal medicine. Its structure supports a swift feedback loop between research, patient care, and pandemic management.

conclusionDeRegCOVID has significantly contributed to understanding COVID-19 pathophysiology, leading to the establishment of NATON. The National Autopsy Registry (NAREG), as its successor, embodies a modular and adaptable approach, aiming to enhance autopsy-based research collaboration nationally and, potentially, internationally.

Indexed as

AutopsyCOVID-19RegistriesGermanyHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2AutopsyCOVID-19Disease managementGermanyRegistries

Identifiers

PMID38427066
PMCPMC11045591
OpenAlexW4392358927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.