SynthesisRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2024
Pulse oximetry test for screening congenital heart diseases: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Experience with Implementation of Pulse Oximetry Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease in a Low-Middle-Income Country.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the accuracy of the Pulse Oximetry Test (POT) in screening for Congenital Heart Diseases (CHD) in newborns in the first 48 hours of life.
methodSystematic review of diagnostic test accuracy with meta-analysis. The selection of studies was carried out in June 2021. Studies were selected with newborns, in a hospital or home environment, without a previous diagnosis of CHD, regardless of gestational age at birth, who underwent POT within the first 48 hours after birth. Registration on the PROSPERO platform - CRD42021256286.
resultsTwenty-nine studies were included, totaling a population of 388,491 newborns. POT demonstrated sensitivity of 47% (95% CI: 43% to 50%) and specificity of 98% (95% CI: 98% to 98%). Subgroup analyses were carried out according to the different testing period, inclusion of retests in protocols and population of premature newborns.
conclusionPOT is a test with moderate sensitivity and high specificity. It is more effective when carried out within 24h - 48h of birth; in protocols that present retests, within two hours after the first measurement. It does not show satisfactory effectiveness for premature newborns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.