Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38426815›Full record

ArticleCancer research communications2024

A Pilot Study on Patient-specific Computational Forecasting of Prostate Cancer Growth during Active Surveillance Using an Imaging-informed Biomechanistic Model.

Guillermo Lorenzo, Jon S Heiselman, Michael A Liss, Michael I Miga, Hector Gomez, Thomas E Yankeelov, Alessandro Reali, Thomas J R Hughes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The future of mathematical oncology in the age of AI.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Guillermo LorenzoDepartment of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9090-190X
Jon S HeiselmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.ORCID 0000-0002-4414-8846
Michael A LissDepartment of Urology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-6978-1026
Michael I MigaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.ORCID 0000-0002-0694-9765
Hector GomezSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, and Purdue Institute for Cancer Research, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0002-2553-9091
Thomas E YankeelovOden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-6201-3913
Alessandro RealiDepartment of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0639-7067
Thomas J R HughesOden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-7024-8368

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Deformation Corrected Image Guided Laparoscopic Liver SurgeryR01EB027498 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI JARNAGIN, WILLIAM ROBERT, MIGA, MICHAEL IAN · 2019 to 2022
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active surveillance (AS) is a suitable management option for newly diagnosed prostate cancer, which usually presents low to intermediate clinical risk. Patients enrolled in AS have their tumor monitored via longitudinal multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), PSA tests, and biopsies. Hence, treatment is prescribed when these tests identify progression to higher-risk prostate cancer. However, current AS protocols rely on detecting tumor progression through direct observation according to population-based monitoring strategies. This approach limits the design of patient-specific AS plans and may delay the detection of tumor progression. Here, we present a pilot study to address these issues by leveraging personalized computational predictions of prostate cancer growth. Our forecasts are obtained with a spatiotemporal biomechanistic model informed by patient-specific longitudinal mpMRI data (T2-weighted MRI and apparent diffusion coefficient maps from diffusion-weighted MRI). Our results show that our technology can represent and forecast the global tumor burden for individual patients, achieving concordance correlation coefficients from 0.93 to 0.99 across our cohort (n = 7). In addition, we identify a model-based biomarker of higher-risk prostate cancer: the mean proliferation activity of the tumor (P = 0.041). Using logistic regression, we construct a prostate cancer risk classifier based on this biomarker that achieves an area under the ROC curve of 0.83. We further show that coupling our tumor forecasts with this prostate cancer risk classifier enables the early identification of prostate cancer progression to higher-risk disease by more than 1 year. Thus, we posit that our predictive technology constitutes a promising clinical decision-making tool to design personalized AS plans for patients with prostate cancer. SIGNIFICANCE: Personalization of a biomechanistic model of prostate cancer with mpMRI data enables the prediction of tumor progression, thereby showing promise to guide clinical decision-making during AS for each individual patient.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsWatchful WaitingHumansMalePilot ProjectsProstateProstate-Specific AntigenProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID38426815
PMCPMC10906139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.