Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38426774›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of primary health care & family medicine2024

Utilisation pattern of ophthalmic services in Ashanti Region, Ghana.

Abdul-Kabir Mohammed, Alvin J Munsamy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of primary health care & family medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abdul-Kabir MohammedDepartment of Optometry, Faculty of Biosciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumas, Ghana; and Department of Optometry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban. kabir265@gmail.com.
Alvin J Munsamy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBest practice in optometry and ophthalmology recommends regular visits to eye care professionals, as routine eye examinations support early detection of ocular defects and associated systemic, sometimes potentially life-threatening, conditions.

aimThe study sought to determine the utilisation of ophthalmic services and its associated factors in the Ashanti region of Ghana.

settingFifty electoral areas in 10 of the 43 districts in the Ashanti region of Ghana.

methodsA total of 1615 participants, aged 18 years and above, were randomly selected in the Ashanti region of Ghana for this population-based, cross-sectional survey. The factors associated with having had an eye examination were guided by Andersen's Behavioural Model. The data were analysed using multiple logistic regression, employing the IBM SPSS software, version 25.

resultsAfter statistical adjustments, compared with the 18-29-year-old age group, older participants were found to be more likely to utilise eye care services: In addition, participants with higher formal education had higher odds for eye care utilisation compared with no former education: Being hypertensive, self-reported vision problems and feeling that regular eye examinations are important, were statistically associated with eye care utilisation.

conclusionThere is alarmingly poor utilisation of ophthalmic services in the Ashanti region of Ghana. Effective programmes to promote public health by addressing the socio-economic and individual barriers hindering the uptake of ophthalmic services in the Ashanti region of Ghana are thus necessary.Contribution: The study addresses a gap in the knowledge of factors associated with ophthalmic services utilisation in the Ashanti region of Ghana.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesAdolescentAdultGhanaHealth ServicesHumansLogistic ModelsOphthalmologyYoung Adultblindnesseye care servicesophthalmic servicesutilisationvisual impairment

Identifiers

PMID38426774
PMCPMC10913157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.