Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38426402›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Tracking subjects' strategies in behavioural choice experiments at trial resolution.

Silvia Maggi, Rebecca M Hock, Martin O'Neill, Mark Buckley, Paula M Moran, Tobias Bast, Musa Sami, Mark D Humphries

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Silvia MaggiSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6533-3509
Rebecca M HockSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0917-570X
Martin O'NeillSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Mark BuckleyDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7455-8486
Paula M MoranSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Tobias BastSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6163-3229
Musa SamiInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Mark D HumphriesSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1906-2581

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M008770/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T00598X/1Medical Research Council MR/J008648/1Medical Research Council MR/K005480/1Medical Research Council MR/P005659/1Medical Research Council MR/S025944/1Medical Research Council MR/W019892/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigating how, when, and what subjects learn during decision-making tasks requires tracking their choice strategies on a trial-by-trial basis. Here, we present a simple but effective probabilistic approach to tracking choice strategies at trial resolution using Bayesian evidence accumulation. We show this approach identifies both successful learning and the exploratory strategies used in decision tasks performed by humans, non-human primates, rats, and synthetic agents. Both when subjects learn and when rules change the exploratory strategies of win-stay and lose-shift, often considered complementary, are consistently used independently. Indeed, we find the use of lose-shift is strong evidence that subjects have latently learnt the salient features of a new rewarded rule. Our approach can be extended to any discrete choice strategy, and its low computational cost is ideally suited for real-time analysis and closed-loop control.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorLearningAnimalsBayes TheoremHumansPrimatesRatsRewardBayesian inferencebehavioural strategydecision makinghumanneuroscienceratrhesus macaque

Identifiers

PMID38426402
PMCPMC10959529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.