ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
PySNV for complex intra-host variation detection.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationIntra-host variants refer to genetic variations or mutations that occur within an individual host organism. These variants are typically studied in the context of viruses, bacteria, or other pathogens to understand the evolution of pathogens. Moreover, intra-host variants are also explored in the field of tumor biology and mitochondrial biology to characterize somatic mutations and inherited heteroplasmic mutations. Intra-host variants can involve long insertions, deletions, and combinations of different mutation types, which poses challenges in their identification. The performance of current methods in detecting of complex intra-host variants is unknown.
resultsFirst, we simulated a dataset comprising 10 samples with 1869 intra-host variants involving various mutation patterns and benchmarked current variant detection software. The results indicated that though current software can detect most variants with F1-scores between 0.76 and 0.97, their performance in detecting long indels and low frequency variants was limited. Thus, we developed a new software, PySNV, for the detection of complex intra-host variations. On the simulated dataset, PySNV successfully detected 1863 variant cases (F1-score: 0.99) and exhibited the highest Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC: 0.99) to the ground truth in predicting variant frequencies. The results demonstrated that PySNV delivered promising performance even for long indels and low frequency variants, while maintaining computational speed comparable to other methods. Finally, we tested its performance on SARS-CoV-2 replicate sequencing data and found that it reported 21% more variants compared to LoFreq, the best-performing benchmarked software, while showing higher consistency (62% over 54%) within replicates. The discrepancies mostly exist in low-depth regions and low frequency variants. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/bnuLyndon/PySNV/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.