Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38426352›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024

PySNV for complex intra-host variation detection.

Liandong Li, Haoyi Fu, Wentai Ma, Mingkun Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Liandong LiKey Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.
Haoyi FuKey Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9696-5445
Wentai MaKey Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.
Mingkun LiKey Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1041-1172

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82161148009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationIntra-host variants refer to genetic variations or mutations that occur within an individual host organism. These variants are typically studied in the context of viruses, bacteria, or other pathogens to understand the evolution of pathogens. Moreover, intra-host variants are also explored in the field of tumor biology and mitochondrial biology to characterize somatic mutations and inherited heteroplasmic mutations. Intra-host variants can involve long insertions, deletions, and combinations of different mutation types, which poses challenges in their identification. The performance of current methods in detecting of complex intra-host variants is unknown.

resultsFirst, we simulated a dataset comprising 10 samples with 1869 intra-host variants involving various mutation patterns and benchmarked current variant detection software. The results indicated that though current software can detect most variants with F1-scores between 0.76 and 0.97, their performance in detecting long indels and low frequency variants was limited. Thus, we developed a new software, PySNV, for the detection of complex intra-host variations. On the simulated dataset, PySNV successfully detected 1863 variant cases (F1-score: 0.99) and exhibited the highest Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC: 0.99) to the ground truth in predicting variant frequencies. The results demonstrated that PySNV delivered promising performance even for long indels and low frequency variants, while maintaining computational speed comparable to other methods. Finally, we tested its performance on SARS-CoV-2 replicate sequencing data and found that it reported 21% more variants compared to LoFreq, the best-performing benchmarked software, while showing higher consistency (62% over 54%) within replicates. The discrepancies mostly exist in low-depth regions and low frequency variants. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/bnuLyndon/PySNV/.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSoftwareGenetic VariationINDEL MutationMutation

Identifiers

PMID38426352
PMCPMC10937218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.