ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Convolutional neural network (CNN)-enabled electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis: a comparison between standard twelve-lead and single-lead setups.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in the Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram by Artificial Intelligence.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Optimizing single-lead ECG axis for AI-based detection of myocardial diseases.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled 8-Channel ECG Diagnosing of Abnormalities with Wide QRS Complexes.Health data science · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in neurocardiology: decoding brain-heart network interactions for clinical and translational insights.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Vagal nerve stimulation in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury: from bench to bedside.Bioelectronic medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise in the early detection of various cardiac conditions from a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). However, the ability of AI to identify abnormalities from single-lead recordings across a range of pathological conditions remains to be systematically investigated. This study aims to assess the performance of a convolutional neural network (CNN) using a single-lead (D1) rather than a standard 12-lead setup for accurate identification of ECG abnormalities. Methods: We designed and trained a lightweight CNN to identify 20 different cardiac abnormalities on ECGs, using data from the PTB-XL dataset. With a relatively simple architecture, the network was designed to accommodate different combinations of leads as input (<100,000 learnable parameters). We compared various lead setups such as the standard 12-lead, D1 alone, and D1 paired with an additional lead. Results: This has been corrected to “The CNN based on single-lead ECG (D1) achieved satisfactory performance compared to the standard 12-lead framework (average percentage AUC difference: −8.7%). Notably, for certain diagnostic classes, there was no difference in the diagnostic AUC between the single-lead and the standard 12-lead setups. When a second lead was detected in the CNN in addition to D1, the AUC gap was further reduced to an average percentage difference of -2.8% compared with that of the standard 12-lead setup. Conclusions: A relatively lightweight CNN can predict different classes of cardiac abnormalities from D1 alone and the standard 12-lead ECG. Considering the growing availability of wearable devices capable of recording a D1-like single-lead ECG, we discuss how our findings contribute to the foundation of a large-scale screening of cardiac abnormalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.