Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38426091›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Serum secreted phosphoprotein 1 level is associated with plaque vulnerability in patients with coronary artery disease.

Ke Huang, Shuai Chen, Lin-Jun Yu, Zhi-Ming Wu, Qiu-Jing Chen, Xiao-Qun Wang, Fei-Fei Li, Jing-Meng Liu, Yi-Xuan Wang, Lin-Shuang Mao and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ke Huang *Department of Vascular and Cardiology, Rui Jin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shuai Chen *Department of Vascular and Cardiology, Rui Jin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Lin-Jun YuDepartment of Vascular and Cardiology, Rui Jin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhi-Ming WuDepartment of Vascular and Cardiology, Rui Jin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qiu-Jing ChenInstitute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai Jiaotong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiao-Qun WangDepartment of Vascular and Cardiology, Rui Jin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Fei-Fei LiDepartment of Vascular and Cardiology, Rui Jin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jing-Meng LiuDepartment of Vascular and Cardiology, Rui Jin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yi-Xuan WangDepartment of Vascular and Cardiology, Rui Jin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Lin-Shuang MaoDepartment of Vascular and Cardiology, Rui Jin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wei-Feng ShenDepartment of Vascular and Cardiology, Rui Jin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Rui-Yan ZhangDepartment of Vascular and Cardiology, Rui Jin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ying ShenInstitute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai Jiaotong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Lin LuDepartment of Vascular and Cardiology, Rui Jin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yang DaiDepartment of Vascular and Cardiology, Rui Jin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Feng-Hua DingDepartment of Vascular and Cardiology, Rui Jin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vulnerable plaque was associated with recurrent cardiovascular events. This study was designed to explore predictive biomarkers of vulnerable plaque in patients with coronary artery disease. Methods: To reveal the phenotype-associated cell type in the development of vulnerable plaque and to identify hub gene for pathological process, we combined single-cell RNA and bulk RNA sequencing datasets of human atherosclerotic plaques using Single-Cell Identification of Subpopulations with Bulk Sample Phenotype Correlation (Scissor) and Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). We also validated our results in an independent cohort of patients by using intravascular ultrasound during coronary angiography. Results: Macrophages were found to be strongly correlated with plaque vulnerability while vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC), fibrochondrocyte (FC) and intermediate cell state (ICS) clusters were negatively associated with unstable plaque. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis showed that Secreted Phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1) in the turquoise module was highly correlated with both the gene module and the clinical traits. In a total of 593 patients, serum levels of SPP1 were significantly higher in patients with vulnerable plaques than those with stable plaque (113.21 [73.65 - 147.70] ng/ml versus 71.08 [20.64 - 135.68] ng/ml; Conclusion: Elevated serum SPP1 levels confer an increased risk for plaque vulnerability in patients with coronary artery disease.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseasePlaque, AtheroscleroticBiomarkersCoronary AngiographyHumansOsteopontinBiomarkersOsteopontinSPP1 protein, humanatherosclerosisdata integrationsingle-cell RNA sequencingSPP1vulnerable plaque

Identifiers

PMID38426091
PMCPMC10902157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.