Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38426011›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2024

Biomarkers for assessing pain and pain relief in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Judith A Ten Barge, Mathilde Baudat, Naomi J Meesters, Alida Kindt, Elbert A Joosten, Irwin K M Reiss, Sinno H P Simons, Gerbrich E van den Bosch

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
20.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Judith A Ten BargeDepartment of Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Mathilde BaudatDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Naomi J MeestersDepartment of Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Alida KindtMetabolomics and Analytics Center, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
Elbert A JoostenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Irwin K M ReissDepartment of Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Sinno H P SimonsDepartment of Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Gerbrich E van den BoschDepartment of Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Erasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLLeiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Newborns admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) regularly undergo painful procedures and may face various painful conditions such as postoperative pain. Optimal management of pain in these vulnerable preterm and term born neonates is crucial to ensure their comfort and prevent negative consequences of neonatal pain. This entails accurate and timely identification of pain, non-pharmacological pain treatment and if needed administration of analgesic therapy, evaluation of treatment effectiveness, and monitoring of adverse effects. Despite the widely recognized importance of pain management, pain assessment in neonates has thus far proven to be a challenge. As self-report, the gold standard for pain assessment, is not possible in neonates, other methods are needed. Several observational pain scales have been developed, but these often rely on snapshot and largely subjective observations and may fail to capture pain in certain conditions. Incorporation of biomarkers alongside observational pain scores holds promise in enhancing pain assessment and, by extension, optimizing pain treatment and neonatal outcomes. This review explores the possibilities of integrating biomarkers in pain assessment in the NICU.

Indexed as

analgesic therapybiomarkersinfantneonatal intensive carepainpain measurement

Identifiers

PMID38426011
PMCPMC10902154
OpenAlexW4391841665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.