Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38425987›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2024

A prospective phase II single-arm study and predictive factor analysis of irinotecan as third-line treatment in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

Nuoya Yu, Sha Huang, Zhe Zhang, Mingzhu Huang, Yusheng Wang, Wen Zhang, Xiaowei Zhang, Xiaodong Zhu, Xuedan Sheng, Kaiyue Yu and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02662959 (A Phase II Study of Irinotecan as Single Agent in the Third Line Treatment of Unresectable or Metastatic Gastric Cancer.), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02662959 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

A Phase II Study of Irinotecan as Single Agent in the Third Line Treatment of Unresectable or Metastatic Gastric Cancer.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFudan UniversityRan2015Enrolled93ConditionsStomach NeoplasmsArmsIrinotecan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nuoya YuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8372-6453
Sha HuangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Zhe ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Mingzhu HuangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Yusheng WangDepartment of Digestive, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Wen ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Xiaowei ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Xiaodong ZhuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Xuedan ShengDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Kaiyue YuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Zhiyu ChenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270, Dongan Road, Shanghai 200032, China.
Weijian GuoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270, Dongan Road, Shanghai 200032, China.
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CNFujian Medical University · CNShanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Currently, there is no recommended standard third-line chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer. Objectives: In this study, we aimed to evaluate irinotecan's efficacy and safety in treating metastatic gastric cancer after the failure of first- and second-line chemotherapy. Design: Prospective single-arm, two-center, phase II trial. Methods: Patients were aged 18-70 years, with histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, progressed during or within 3 months following the last administration of second-line chemotherapy and had no other severe hematologic, cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, or renal functional abnormalities or immunodeficiency diseases. Eligible patients received 28-day cycles of irinotecan (180 mg/m Results: A total of 98 eligible patients were enrolled in this study. In the intention-to-treat population, the median OS was 7.17 months, the median PFS was 3.47 months, and the ORR and DCR were 4.08% and 47.96%, respectively. In the per-protocol population, the median OS was 7.77 months, the median PFS was 3.47 months, and the ORR and DCR were 4.82% and 50.60%, respectively. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 hematological and non-hematological toxicities was 19.4%, and none of the patients died owing to adverse events. Cox regression analysis revealed neutropenia and baseline thrombocyte levels were independently correlated with PFS and OS. Conclusion: Irinotecan monotherapy is an efficient, well-tolerated, and economical third-line treatment for patients with metastatic gastric cancer as a third-line treatment. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02662959.

Indexed as

irinotecanmetastatic gastric cancerphase IIprospectivethird-line chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID38425987
PMCPMC10903192
OpenAlexW4392250481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.