Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38425926›Full record

ArticleJACS Au2024

Dissecting the Allosteric Fine-Tuning of Enzyme Catalysis.

Xin-Qiu Yao, Donald Hamelberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACS Au, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xin-Qiu YaoDepartment of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30302-3965, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2706-2028
Donald HamelbergDepartment of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30302-3965, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3785-3037
Georgia State University · USUniversity of Nebraska at Omaha · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fully understanding the mechanism of allosteric regulation in biomolecules requires separating and examining all of the involved factors. In enzyme catalysis, allosteric effector binding shifts the structure and dynamics of the active site, leading to modified energetic (e.g., energy barrier) and dynamical (e.g., diffusion coefficient) factors underlying the catalyzed reaction rate. Such modifications can be subtle and dependent on the type of allosteric effector, representing a fine-tuning of protein function. The microscopic description of allosteric regulation at the level of function-dictating factors has prospective applications in fundamental and pharmaceutical sciences, which is, however, largely missing so far. Here, we characterize the allosteric fine-tuning of enzyme catalysis, using human Pin1 as an example, by performing more than half-millisecond all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. Changes of reaction kinetics and the dictating factors, including the free energy surface along the reaction coordinate and the diffusion coefficient of the reaction dynamics, under various enzyme and allosteric effector binding conditions are examined. Our results suggest equal importance of the energetic and dynamical factors, both of which can be modulated allosterically, and the combined effect determines the final allosteric output. We also reveal the potential dynamic basis for allosteric modulation using an advanced statistical technique to detect function-related conformational dynamics. Methods developed in this work can be applied to other allosteric systems.

Identifiers

PMID38425926
PMCPMC10900222
OpenAlexW4391574679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.