Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38425723›Full record

ArticleShape in medical imaging : International Workshop, ShapeMI 2023, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2023, Vancouver, BC, Canada, October 8, 2023, Proceedings. ShapeMI (Workshop) (2023 : Vancouver, B.C.)2023

IcoConv : Explainable brain cortical surface analysis for ASD classification.

Ugo Rodriguez, Tahya Deddah, Sun Hyung Kim, Mark Shen, Kelly N Botteron, D Louis Collins, Stephen R Dager, Annette M Estes, Alan C Evans, Heather C Hazlett and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Shape in medical imaging : International Workshop, ShapeMI 2023, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2023, Vancouver, BC, Canada, October 8, 2023, Proceedings. ShapeMI (Workshop) (2023 : Vancouver, B.C.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Attention Rings for Shape Analysis and Application to MRI Quality Control.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ugo RodriguezUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Tahya DeddahUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Sun Hyung KimUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Mark ShenUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Kelly N BotteronWashington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
D Louis CollinsMcGill University, Montréal, Québec.
Stephen R DagerUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Annette M EstesUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Alan C EvansMcGill University, Montréal, Québec.
Heather C HazlettUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Robert McKinstryWashington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Robert T ShultzChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Joseph PivenUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Quyen DangUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Martin StynerUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Juan Carlos PrietoUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.

Funding

Preclinical CoreP50HD103573 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Mark D Shen · 2020 to 2026
$9.7M
Shape Analysis Toolbox: From medical images to quantitative insights of anatomyR01EB021391 · NIBIB · KITWARE, INC. · PI PANIAGUA, BEATRIZ · 2016 to 2024
$3.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB021391NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103573
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we introduce a novel approach for the analysis and interpretation of 3D shapes, particularly applied in the context of neuroscientific research. Our method captures 2D perspectives from various vantage points of a 3D object. These perspectives are subsequently analyzed using 2D Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), uniquely modified with custom pooling mechanisms. We sought to assess the efficacy of our approach through a binary classification task involving subjects at high risk for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). The task entailed differentiating between high-risk positive and high-risk negative ASD cases. To do this, we employed brain attributes like cortical thickness, surface area, and extra-axial cerebral spinal measurements. We then mapped these measurements onto the surface of a sphere and subsequently analyzed them via our bespoke method. One distinguishing feature of our method is the pooling of data from diverse views using our icosahedron convolution operator. This operator facilitates the efficient sharing of information between neighboring views. A significant contribution of our method is the generation of gradient-based explainability maps, which can be visualized on the brain surface. The insights derived from these explainability images align with prior research findings, particularly those detailing the brain regions typically impacted by ASD. Our innovative approach thereby substantiates the known understanding of this disorder while potentially unveiling novel areas of study.

Indexed as

ASDbrainShape Analysis

Identifiers

PMID38425723
PMCPMC10902712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.