ArticleBelitung nursing journal2024
Evaluating ICU nurses' education, practice, and competence in palliative and end-of-life care in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Belitung nursing journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Palliative and end-of-life nursing care in Saudi Arabia: A systematic review of nursing practices, challenges, and patient-family outcomes.Palliative & supportive care · 2026Pooled it
- A narrative review of nursing in Saudi Arabia: prospects for improving social determinants of health for the female workforce.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Self-compassion, palliative care self-efficacy, and spiritual care preparedness among nursing students: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- End-of-Life Care Stress, Attitudes Toward End-of-Life Care, and End-of-Life Care Performance as Predictors of Job Satisfaction Among Nurses Working in Hospitals in South Korea.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In palliative and end-of-life (PEOL) care, especially within intensive care units (ICUs), nurses' unique skills are critical, yet their expertise remains under-explored, particularly in Saudi Arabia. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the education, practice, and perceived competence of adult ICU nurses in Saudi Arabia regarding PEOL care and to pinpoint key factors that influence this aspect of healthcare delivery. Methods: A cross-sectional design was utilized in this study. Participants were recruited from five public hospitals and one specialized center in Hail, Saudi Arabia. Data were gathered in September 2023 using the PEOL Care Index, which measures various care dimensions on a Likert scale in Arabic and English. IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0 was used for statistical analysis, particularly to conduct ANOVA, t-test, and multiple regression. Results: 142 out of the targeted 171 ICU nurses completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 83.04%. Although 81% of the nurses had experience caring for dying patients, only 30.3% had received in-service PEOL care training. Those with this training demonstrated significantly higher scores in education, clinical practice, and perceived competence than their counterparts ( Conclusion: The study highlighted the proficiency of ICU nurses in PEOL care, emphasizing that in-service training, job satisfaction, and the authority to communicate effectively with patients and their families significantly improved clinical practice and nurses' competence in PEOL care. This underlines the critical need for healthcare institutions to acknowledge and address these key factors to optimize patient care outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.