Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38425674›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Machine learning algorithms to uncover risk factors of breast cancer: insights from a large case-control study.

Mostafa Dianati-Nasab, Khodakaram Salimifard, Reza Mohammadi, Sara Saadatmand, Mohammad Fararouei, Kosar S Hosseini, Behshid Jiavid-Sharifi, Thierry Chaussalet, Samira Dehdar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mostafa Dianati-NasabSchool of Medical and Life Sciences, Sunway University, Sunway City, Malaysia.
Khodakaram SalimifardComputational Intelligence & Intelligent Optimization Research Group, Business & Economics School, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran.
Reza MohammadiDepartment of Operation Management, Amsterdam Business School, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Sara SaadatmandComputational Intelligence & Intelligent Optimization Research Group, Business & Economics School, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran.
Mohammad FararoueiSchool of Medical and Life Sciences, Sunway University, Sunway City, Malaysia.
Kosar S HosseiniDepartment of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Behshid Jiavid-SharifiSchool of Medical and Life Sciences, Sunway University, Sunway City, Malaysia.
Thierry ChaussaletComputer Science and Engineering, University of Westminster, London, United Kingdom.
Samira DehdarComputational Intelligence & Intelligent Optimization Research Group, Business & Economics School, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This large case-control study explored the application of machine learning models to identify risk factors for primary invasive incident breast cancer (BC) in the Iranian population. This study serves as a bridge toward improved BC prevention, early detection, and management through the identification of modifiable and unmodifiable risk factors. Methods: The dataset includes 1,009 cases and 1,009 controls, with comprehensive data on lifestyle, health-behavior, reproductive and sociodemographic factors. Different machine learning models, namely Random Forest (RF), Neural Networks (NN), Bootstrap Aggregating Classification and Regression Trees (Bagged CART), and Extreme Gradient Boosting Tree (XGBoost), were employed to analyze the data. Results: The findings highlight the significance of a chest X-ray history, deliberate weight loss, abortion history, and post-menopausal status as predictors. Factors such as second-hand smoking, lower education, menarche age (>14), occupation (employed), first delivery age (18-23), and breastfeeding duration (>42 months) were also identified as important predictors in multiple models. The RF model exhibited the highest Area Under the Curve (AUC) value of 0.9, as indicated by the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Following closely was the Bagged CART model with an AUC of 0.89, while the XGBoost model achieved a slightly lower AUC of 0.78. In contrast, the NN model demonstrated the lowest AUC of 0.74. On the other hand, the RF model achieved an accuracy of 83.9% and a Kappa coefficient of 67.8% and the XGBoost, achieved a lower accuracy of 82.5% and a lower Kappa coefficient of 0.6. Conclusion: This study could be beneficial for targeted preventive measures according to the main risk factors for BC among high-risk women.

Indexed as

bootstrap aggregating classification and regression treebreast cancerextreme gradient boostingmachine learningneural networksrandom forestrisk factor

Identifiers

PMID38425674
PMCPMC10903343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.