Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38425671›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2024

Understanding specific gender dynamics in the cowpea value chain for key traits to inform cowpea breeding programs in Malawi, Mozambique and Tanzania.

Michael M Chipeta, Jessica Kampanje-Phiri, Dumisani Moyo, Henriques Colial, Mussa Tamba, Divage Belarmino, Joseph Hella, Esnart Yohane, Naomi Mvula, John Kafwambira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Michael M ChipetaLilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Jessica Kampanje-PhiriLilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Dumisani MoyoDevelopment with Data Science (DDSc), Lilongwe, Malawi.
Henriques ColialInstituto De Investigação Agrária De Moçambique, Nampula, Mozambique.
Mussa TambaTanzania Agriculture Research Institute, Illonga, Tanzania.
Divage BelarminoInstituto De Investigação Agrária De Moçambique, Nampula, Mozambique.
Joseph HellaSokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Esnart YohaneDepartment of Agricultural Research Services, Chitedze Research Station, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Naomi MvulaLilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe, Malawi.
John KafwambiraLilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources · MWInstituto de Investigação Agrária de Moçambique · MZMikocheni Agricultural Research Institute · TZSokoine University of Agriculture · TZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cowpea is an important food and nutrition security crop in Malawi, Mozambique and Tanzania and it is mainly produced by women farmers mainly on a subsistence scale. The majority of these farmers use local varieties despite the availability of improved varieties in the region. Low acceptability and adoption of improved varieties have also hampered cowpea breeding efforts. The low adoption, especially among women farmers, has been attributed to the failure by breeding programs to involve farmers in the process of designing and developing improved varieties with a view to meeting their priorities and preferences. Despite women constituting the majority of cowpea farmers in these countries, no comprehensive gender analysis on cowpea value chain had been instituted to understand the traits that are gender and youth responsive and how to incorporate them in the product profiling so that the developed varieties benefit men, women and youth. The main objective of the gender study was, therefore, to identify preferred traits by different gender groups within the whole cowpea value chain to inform cowpea breeding programs in the three countries. Methods: The study employed quantitative and qualitative methods to elucidate preferences, including value chain mapping, a quantitative survey of farmers, focus group discussions and key informant interviews targeting farmers/consumers, traders, policymakers and processors. Results and discussion: Results showed that the top-ranking traits in order of importance across the countries and gender were; (1) high grain yield, (2) good grain taste, (3) early maturity time, (4) large grain size, (5) good leaf taste and (6) short cooking time. It was further noted that different gender groups preferred almost similar traits though minor variations were noted in terms of prioritization of these traits. These results have had two major influences on our cowpea breeding program: firstly, the breeding program changed the way it prioritizes traits to include ones that reflect the needs of men, women and the youth in the cowpea value chain. Secondly, our breeding objectives are closely aligned to gender differences in the target population of farmers and other users, by incorporating key priority traits that address the needs of both men and women, including the youth. That is to say, product targets and specific product profiles are more gender sensitive. Since the breeding work is ongoing, the expectation is that the development of improved varieties resulting from this gender sensitive process will translate into higher adoption levels of these varieties (compared with previous releases), which might have ripple effects on food, nutrition and income security in the region.

Indexed as

cowpea value chaingender sensitive cowpea breedingpriority traitsproduct profilestrait preferences

Identifiers

PMID38425671
PMCPMC10901980
OpenAlexW4391841775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.