ArticleDigital health
Refined image quality assessment for color fundus photography based on deep learning.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Role of Multimodal Imaging in Optic Disc Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Customizing AI-based screening with real-world data: Practical insights from diabetic retinopathy.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Color fundus photography is widely used in clinical and screening settings for eye diseases. Poor image quality greatly affects the reliability of further evaluation and diagnosis. In this study, we developed an automated assessment module for color fundus photography image quality assessment using deep learning. Methods: A total of 55,931 color fundus photography images from multiple centers in Shanghai and the public database were collected and annotated as training, validation, and testing data sets. The pre-diagnosis image quality assessment module based on the multi-task deep neural network was designed. The detailed criterion of color fundus photography image quality including three subcategories with three levels of grading was applied to improve precision and objectivity. The auxiliary tasks such as the localization of the optic nerve head and macula, the classification of laterality, and the field of view were also included to assist the quality assessment. Finally, we validated our module internally and externally by evaluating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and quadratic weighted Kappa. Results: The "Location" subcategory achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.991, 0.920, and 0.946 for the three grades, respectively. The "Clarity" subcategory achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.980, 0.917, and 0.954 for the three grades, respectively. The "Artifact" subcategory achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.976, 0.952, and 0.986 for the three grades, respectively. The accuracy and Kappa of overall quality reach 88.15% and 89.70%, respectively, on the internal set. These two indicators on the external set were 86.63% and 88.55%, respectively, which were very close to that of the internal set. Conclusions: This work showed that our deep module was able to evaluate the color fundus photography image quality using more detailed three subcategories with three grade criteria. The promising results on both internal and external validation indicated the strength and generalizability of our module.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.