Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38425654›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Refined image quality assessment for color fundus photography based on deep learning.

Tianjiao Guo, Kun Liu, Haidong Zou, Xun Xu, Jie Yang, Qi Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tianjiao GuoInstitute of Medical Robotics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3186-0762
Kun LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China.
Haidong ZouDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China.
Xun XuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China.
Jie YangDepartment of Automation, Institute of Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China.
Qi YuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Color fundus photography is widely used in clinical and screening settings for eye diseases. Poor image quality greatly affects the reliability of further evaluation and diagnosis. In this study, we developed an automated assessment module for color fundus photography image quality assessment using deep learning. Methods: A total of 55,931 color fundus photography images from multiple centers in Shanghai and the public database were collected and annotated as training, validation, and testing data sets. The pre-diagnosis image quality assessment module based on the multi-task deep neural network was designed. The detailed criterion of color fundus photography image quality including three subcategories with three levels of grading was applied to improve precision and objectivity. The auxiliary tasks such as the localization of the optic nerve head and macula, the classification of laterality, and the field of view were also included to assist the quality assessment. Finally, we validated our module internally and externally by evaluating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and quadratic weighted Kappa. Results: The "Location" subcategory achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.991, 0.920, and 0.946 for the three grades, respectively. The "Clarity" subcategory achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.980, 0.917, and 0.954 for the three grades, respectively. The "Artifact" subcategory achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.976, 0.952, and 0.986 for the three grades, respectively. The accuracy and Kappa of overall quality reach 88.15% and 89.70%, respectively, on the internal set. These two indicators on the external set were 86.63% and 88.55%, respectively, which were very close to that of the internal set. Conclusions: This work showed that our deep module was able to evaluate the color fundus photography image quality using more detailed three subcategories with three grade criteria. The promising results on both internal and external validation indicated the strength and generalizability of our module.

Indexed as

Color fundus photographydeep learningimage quality assessmentpre-diagnosisscreening

Identifiers

PMID38425654
PMCPMC10903193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.