Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38425633›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Sleeping Paralysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mahmoud T Hefnawy, Basma E Amer, Samar A Amer, Khaled Moghib, Yehya Khlidj, Bahaa Elfakharany, Adel Mouffokes, Zainab J Alazzeh, Nishant P Soni, Muhannad Wael and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Nightmares or a crippling reality? A review on sleep paralysis.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025
    Review
  6. Prodromal dreams.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mahmoud T HefnawyFaculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, EGY.
Basma E AmerFaculty of Medicine, Banha University, Banha, EGY.
Samar A AmerFamily Medicine, Royal College of General Practice, London, GBR.
Khaled MoghibFaculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, EGY.
Yehya KhlidjFaculty of Medicine, University of Algiers Benyoucef Benkhedda, Algiers, DZA.
Bahaa ElfakharanyFaculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Pharos University, Alexandria, EGY.
Adel MouffokesInternal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oran 1 Ahmed Ben Bella, Oran, DZA.
Zainab J AlazzehFaculty of Medicine, Jordanian University of Science and Technology, Ar-Ramtha, JOR.
Nishant P SoniMedicine, Gujarat Medical Education and Research Society Medical College and Hospital, Ahmedabad, IND.
Muhannad WaelUrology, Saint Joseph Hospital, Jerusalem, PSE.
Mohamed E ElsayedDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, DEU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleep paralysis (SP) is a mixed state of consciousness and sleep, combining features of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep with those of wakefulness. The exact cause of SP is unknown, and its prevalence varies among the studies. We aim to identify SP's global prevalence, the affected population's characteristics, and the SP's clinical picture. We searched three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS)) using a unique search strategy to identify eligible studies. All observational studies identifying the prevalence or frequency of sleeping paralysis were included. No exclusions are made based on country, race, or questionnaire. The analysis was performed using the latest version of R software (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria). The analysis included 76 studies from 25 countries with 167,133 participants. The global prevalence of SP was 30% (95% CI (22%, 39%)). There were similar frequencies of isolated SP and SP (33%, 95% CI (26%, 42%), I2 = 97%, P <0.01; 31%, 95% CI (21%, 43%), I2 = 100%, P = 0, respectively). A subgroup analysis showed that the majority of those who experienced SP were psychiatric patients (35%, 95% CI (20%, 55%), I2 = 96%, P <0.01). The prevalence among non-psychiatric patients was among students (34%, 95% CI (23%, 47%), I2 = 100%, P = 0). Auditory and visual hallucinations were reported in 24.25% of patients. Around 4% had only visual hallucinations. Meta-regression showed no association between the frequency of SP and sex. Publication bias was detected among the included studies through visual inspection of funnel plot asymmetry. Our findings revealed that 30% of the population suffered from SP, especially psychiatric patients and students. The majority of SP cases lacked associated hallucinations, while a noteworthy proportion experienced combined visual and auditory hallucinations.

Indexed as

hallucinationsisolated sleep paralysisispprevalenceptsdsleeping paralysissp

Identifiers

PMID38425633
PMCPMC10902800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.