ArticleCureus2024
Separating Out Pulmonary Sequestration.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic-assisted cardiothoracic surgery: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of trends, innovations, and future directions.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Review
- Surgical Management of Congenital Lung Malformations in Children-A Single-Center Analysis of 25 Years of Experience.The clinical respiratory journal · 2026Article
- Pulmonary Sequestration in Adults: Endovascular and Hybrid Treatment Strategies-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary sequestration (PS) is a rare congenital anomaly that accounts for 1% to 6% of all pulmonary malformations at birth. It is characterized by a focal area of pulmonary tissue that does not have direct communication with the tracheobronchial tree and does not get blood supply from the pulmonary circulation. We present the case of a 28-year-old female with a history of recurrent pulmonary infections who was found to have intralobar sequestration and underwent curative surgical excision. Because pulmonary sequestration is commonly misdiagnosed, as it can mimic other conditions on chest X-rays, this case illustrates the importance of recognizing pulmonary sequestration as a separate entity and diagnosing/treating it appropriately. The patient presented to the hospital with a one-week history of upper chest pain. Chest radiograph showed mild hyperinflated right lung. Computed tomography angiogram (CTA) revealed an 8.9 x 8.3 cm area of hyper-lucency and decreased normal lung architecture in the right lower lobe with an aberrant arterial blood supply suggestive of intralobar pulmonary sequestration. The patient was referred to cardiothoracic surgery and underwent preoperative outpatient pulmonary function testing, which was unremarkable. The patient subsequently underwent successful robotic resection of the right lower lobe sequestration and the pathology report confirmed PS. A diagnosis of pulmonary sequestration is commonly missed, as it can mimic other conditions on chest X-rays. It can present as a solitary nodule or mass, cystic lesion, consolidation, or an air-fluid level. The period between symptom onset and diagnosis is typically more than five years. While digital subtraction angiography is considered the gold standard for imaging, CTA is now preferred because it allows for clear visualization of lung parenchyma and vascular assisting in surgical planning. For our patient, CTA demonstrated a prominent tubular vessel, which showed less enhancement than the opacified pulmonary artery and pulmonary veins, suggestive of an abnormal vascular supply for the right lower lobe sequestration. Management of intralobar sequestration is curative surgical excision. Both video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and posterolateral thoracotomy are viable options for resection. It should be noted that in symptomatic patients, it is recommended to proceed with surgical resection. However, in asymptomatic individuals with intralobar sequestration (ILS), surgical resection is not required but could be considered as prophylaxis to prevent recurrent infections. Asymptomatic individuals with extralobar sequestration (ELS), on the other hand, should undergo serial monitoring as non-operative management is appropriate. This case highlights the importance of including pulmonary sequestration, especially intralobar sequestration in the differential diagnosis of recurrent localized pulmonary infections, especially in a patient who is otherwise healthy. Although rare, it is important to consider this congenital anomaly when evaluating patients with recurrent localized pulmonary infections, chest pain, or hemoptysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.