ReviewCureus2024
Biomarkers of Pre-eclampsia in Pregnant Women With Gestational Diabetes and Pre-existing Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pre-eclampsia (PE) is one of the leading causes of maternal and perinatal health morbidity, producing more than 4.6% of complications in pregnancy worldwide. This systematic review was conducted to determine the significance of specific biomarkers in predicting PE in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). The review measured and explained the significant abnormalities in lipids, blood glucose, cytokines, inflammatory markers, placental proteins, urinary proteins, and other serum biomarkers that contribute to the development of PE in GDM and type 2 DM populations. We searched CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline, Maternity and Infant care, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies were included if they had a measurable component in the blood serum or urine of women who developed PE and suffered from GDM or pre-existing type 2 DM. A narrative synthesis was conducted instead of a meta-analysis due to the high heterogeneity of data from the studies. A total of 2,593 studies were screened, producing eight relevant studies. Twenty-seven different biomarkers were investigated from the study group of 40 to 1,344 participants. No single biomarker was identified; however, there is a need for further research on specific biomarkers of PE, especially in CRP, FABP4, and microalbuminuria in the GDM-PE group and calprotectin in the type 2 DM population. Many biomarkers were identified as practical in predicting PE when combined with other biomarkers and more data are required to verify the predictability of the diagnostic markers in pregnant women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.