Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38425473›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of telemedicine and applications2024

High Diagnostic Accuracy of Long-Term Electrocardiogram Interpretation by General Practitioners.

Jarle Jortveit, Miroslav Boskovic, Edvard Liljedahl Sandberg, Jonas Vegsundvåg, Sigrun Halvorsen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of telemedicine and applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04700865 (The South-Norway Atrial Fibrillation Screening Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04700865 nacompletednot on this map

The South-Norway Atrial Fibrillation Screening Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSorlandet Hospital HFRan2020 to 2022Enrolled1,500ConditionsAtrial FibrillationArmsAF screening
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jarle JortveitDepartment of Cardiology, Sorlandet Hospital, Arendal, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0524-9852
Miroslav BoskovicDepartment of Cardiology, Sorlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2156-147X
Edvard Liljedahl SandbergDepartment of Cardiology, Sorlandet Hospital, Arendal, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1603-3558
Jonas VegsundvågDepartment of Primary Health Care Services, Aalesund Municipality, Aalesund, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4545-5435
Sigrun HalvorsenDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Ullevaal, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7561-7644
Sørlandet Hospital Arendal · NOOslo University Hospital · NOSørlandet Sykehus · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Traditional long-term ECG monitoring systems have primarily been used by cardiologist. New remote and wearable easy-to-use devices have led to increased use of ECG recordings also outside cardiology clinics. The aims of this study were to assess the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of interpretation of the one-lead ECG recordings from a patch ECG device (ECG247 Smart Heart Sensor system) by general practitioners (GP). Methods: Norwegian GPs were invited to digitally assess 10 long-term ECG recordings with different arrhythmias performed by the ECG247 Smart Heart Sensor system. For all ECG examinations, the presence/absence of different arrhythmias was registered. Results: A total of 40 GPs accepted the invitation and assessed all the 10 long-term ECG recordings. All the tests were assessed as interpretable by all the GPs. Arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation/flutter, supraventricular tachycardia, and ventricular tachycardia) were correctly identified in most cases, with sensitivity of 98% (95% CI 95-99%), specificity of 75% (95% CI 68-82%), and diagnostic accuracy of 89% (85-92%). Incorrect automatic system algorithm interpretations were rarely corrected by the GPs. Conclusion: GPs interpreted one-lead recordings by the ECG247 Smart Heart Sensor system with high diagnostic accuracy for common arrhythmias. However, in cases with rare arrhythmias, we recommend consulting a cardiologist to confirm the diagnosis before treatment is initiated. This trial is registered with NCT04700865.

Identifiers

PMID38425473
PMCPMC10904176
OpenAlexW4392029798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.