Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38425458›Full record

ArticleBiomedical materials & devices (New York, N.Y.)2024

Bioactive Protein and Peptide Release from a Mucoadhesive Electrospun Membrane.

Jake G Edmans, Craig Murdoch, Paul V Hatton, Lars Siim Madsen, Martin E Santocildes-Romero, Sebastian G Spain, Helen E Colley

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical materials & devices (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jake G EdmansSchool of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, 19 Claremont Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2TA UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4539-9145
Craig MurdochSchool of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, 19 Claremont Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2TA UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9724-122X
Paul V HattonSchool of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, 19 Claremont Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2TA UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5234-1104
Lars Siim MadsenAFYX Therapeutics, Ole Maaløes Vej 3, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Martin E Santocildes-RomeroAFYX Therapeutics, Ole Maaløes Vej 3, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3805-3055
Sebastian G SpainDepartment of Chemistry, University of Sheffield, Brook Hill, Sheffield, S3 7HF UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7241-5713
Helen E ColleySchool of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, 19 Claremont Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2TA UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0053-7468
University of Sheffield · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-based biologics constitute a rapidly expanding category of therapeutic agents with high target specificity. Their clinical use has dramatically increased in recent years, but administration is largely via injection. Drug delivery across the oral mucosa is a promising alternative to injections, in order to avoid the gastrointestinal tract and first-pass metabolism. Current drug delivery formulations include liquid sprays, mucoadhesive tablets and films, which lack dose control in the presence of salivary flow. To address this, electrospun membranes that adhere tightly to the oral mucosa and release drugs locally have been developed. Here, we investigated the suitability of these mucoadhesive membranes for peptide or protein release. Bradykinin (0.1%) or insulin (1, 3, and 5%) were incorporated by electrospinning from ethanol/water mixtures. Immersion of membranes in buffer resulted in the rapid release of bradykinin, with a maximal release of 70 ± 12% reached after 1 h. In contrast, insulin was liberated more slowly, with 88 ± 11, 69.0 ± 5.4, and 63.9 ± 9.0% cumulative release of the total encapsulated dose after 8 h for membranes containing 1, 3, and 5% w/w insulin, respectively. Membrane-eluted bradykinin retained pharmacological activity by inducing rapid intracellular calcium release upon binding to its cell surface receptor on oral fibroblasts, when examined by flow cytometry. To quantify further, time-lapse confocal microscopy revealed that membrane-eluted bradykinin caused a 1.58 ± 0.16 fold-change in intracellular calcium fluorescence after 10 s compared to bradykinin solution (2.13 ± 0.21), relative to placebo. In conclusion, these data show that electrospun membranes may be highly effective vehicles for site-specific administration of biotherapeutic proteins or peptides directly to the oral mucosa for either local or systemic drug delivery applications.

Indexed as

BradykininDrug deliveryElectrospinningInsulinMucoadhesionOral mucosaPeptides

Identifiers

PMID38425458
PMCPMC10899313
OpenAlexW4381550758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.