Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38425423›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2024

Muscle activity and rehabilitation in spinal stenosis (MARSS) after conservative therapy and surgical decompression with or without fusion: Protocol for a partially randomized patient preference trial on rehabilitation timing.

Eduard Kurz, Philipp Schenk, Florian Brakopp, Moritz Diers, Oliver Klingel, Stefan Bone, Hans Jörg Meisel, Karl-Stefan Delank, Bernhard W Ullrich

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eduard KurzDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Philipp SchenkDepartment of Science, Research and Education, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle gGmbH, Merseburger Str. 165, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Florian BrakoppDepartment of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle gGmbH, Merseburger Str. 165, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Moritz DiersDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Oliver KlingelSaline Rehabilitationsklinik, Mansfelder Str. 52, 06108, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Stefan BoneDepartment of Neurosurgery, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle gGmbH, Merseburger Str. 165, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Hans Jörg MeiselDepartment of Neurosurgery, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle gGmbH, Merseburger Str. 165, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Karl-Stefan DelankDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Bernhard W UllrichDepartment of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle gGmbH, Merseburger Str. 165, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany.
BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle · DEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients affected by lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) suffer from a multifactorial degeneration of the lumbar spine resulting in narrowing of the neuroforamina and spinal canal, leading to various functional limitations. It remains unclear whether LSS patients after surgery would benefit from early post-operative rehabilitation, or if a delayed rehabilitation would be more advantageous. The purpose of this partially randomized patient preference trial is to evaluate the impact of post-operative rehabilitation timing as well as surgical intervention type on psychometric properties and functional outcomes in patients with LSS. Methods: Data for this patient preference trial are collected before and after surgical (decompression only or decompression and fusion) and rehabilitative interventions as well as six, 12 and 24 months after completing rehabilitation. The study participants are patients diagnosed with LSS who are at least 18 years old. After a medical check-up, participants will complete patient-reported outcome measures (PAREMO-20, SIBAR, FREM-8, SF-12, SFI, ODI) and different functional assessments (functional reach test, loaded reach test, handgrip strength, standing balance control, 6-min walk test). Ethics and dissemination: The results of this study will be published through peer-reviewed publications and scientific contributions at national and international conferences. This research has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (reference number: 2022-128).

Indexed as

DecompressionFusionMuscle functionRehabilitationSpinal stenosisSurface EMGSurgery

Identifiers

PMID38425423
PMCPMC10904237
OpenAlexW4392059440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.