Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38425421›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medical technology2024

Current clinical opinion on surgical approaches and rehabilitation of hand flexor tendon injury-a questionnaire study.

Ruikang Xue, Jason Wong, Angela Imere, Heather King, Peter Clegg, Sarah Cartmell

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medical technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06838247 (Detection of Simultaneous Presence of Shoulder Lesions in Patients With Hand Injuries by Diagnostic Ultrasonography), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06838247 recruitingnot on this map

Detection of Simultaneous Presence of Shoulder Lesions in Patients With Hand Injuries by Diagnostic Ultrasonography

TypeobservationalSponsorAnkara Training and Research HospitalRan2024 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsShoulder, Ultrasonographic, Hand Injuries
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruikang XueDepartment of Materials, Faculty of Science and Engineering, School of Natural Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Jason WongDivision of Cell Matrix Biology & Regenerative Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Angela ImereDepartment of Materials, Faculty of Science and Engineering, School of Natural Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Heather KingAddos Consulting Ltd, Winchester, United Kingdom.
Peter CleggDepartment and of Musculoskeletal and Ageing Science, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, William Henry Duncan Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Sarah CartmellDepartment of Materials, Faculty of Science and Engineering, School of Natural Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of flexor tendon injury has seen many iterations over the years, but more substantial innovations in practice have been sadly lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the current practice of flexor tendon injury management, and variation in practice from the previous reports, most troublesome complications, and whether there was a clinical interest in potential innovative tendon repair technologies. An online survey was distributed via the British Society for Surgery of the Hand (BSSH) and a total of 132 responses were collected anonymously. Results showed that although most surgeons followed the current medical recommendation based on the literature, a significant number of surgeons still employed more conventional treatments in clinic, such as general anesthesia, ineffective tendon retrieval techniques, and passive rehabilitation. Complications including adhesion formation and re-rupture remained persistent. The interest in new approaches such as use of minimally invasive instruments, biodegradable materials and additive manufactured devices was not strong, however the surgeons were potentially open to more effective and economic solutions.

Indexed as

clinical opinionflexor tendonrepairretrievalsurvey

Identifiers

PMID38425421
PMCPMC10902169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.