ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2024
Preoperative controlling nutritional status as an optimal prognostic nutritional index to predict the outcome for colorectal cancer.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prognostic value of the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score in cancer: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Prognostic value of controlling nutritional status score (CONUT) in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Prognostic significance of the pretreatment controlling nutritional status score in colorectal cancer patients: an updated meta-analysis with 24 cohort studies.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Prognostic effect of the pretreatment prognostic nutritional index in cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis.BMC women's health · 2024Pooled it
- Predictors of Metastatic Lymph Node Burden in Colorectal Cancer: A Negative Binomial Regression Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Diagnostic utility and discriminative ability of cholesterol-modified prognostic nutritional index and inflammatory indicators in colorectal cancer: a retrospective case-control study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Association between CONUT scores and survival outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: meta-analysis from 4973 Asian cases.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Prognostic value of albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio and CONUT score in rectal cancer patients undergoing XELOX-based chemotherapy: development of a nomogram-based predictive model.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of CONUT and NRI as nutritional risk screening tools in peritoneal dialysis: a multicenter study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Osteosarcopenia: the coexistence of sarcopenia and osteopenia is predictive of prognosis and postoperative complications after curative resection for colorectal cancer.Surgery today · 2025Article
- Is nutritional status a new indicator to use in clinical practice for colorectal cancer patients?World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- The association between controlling nutritional status and postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with colorectal cancer.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score effectively reflects a patient's nutritional status, which is closely related to cancer prognosis. This study investigated the relationship between the CONUT score and prognosis after radical surgery for colorectal cancer, and compared the predictive ability of the CONUT score with other indexes.
aimTo analyze the predictive performance of the CONUT score for the survival rate of colorectal cancer patients who underwent potentially curative resection.
methodsThis retrospective analysis included 217 patients with newly diagnosed colorectal. The CONUT score was calculated based on the serum albumin level, total lymphocyte count, and total cholesterol level. The cutoff value of the CONUT score for predicting prognosis was 4 according to the Youden Index by the receiver operating characteristic curve. The associations between the CONUT score and the prognosis were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis.
resultsUsing the cutoff value of the CONUT score, patients were stratified into CONUT low (
conclusionAs a nutritional indicator, the CONUT score could predict long-term outcomes after radical surgery for colorectal cancer, and its predictive ability was superior to other indexes. The correlation between the CONUT score and skeletal muscle may be one of the factors that play a predictive role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.