Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38425369›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2024

Stricture dilation

Brendan P Halloran, Matthew Reeson, Christopher Teshima, Karen Kroeker, Vivian Huang, Levinus Dieleman, Peter Holmes, Daniel C Baumgart, Karen Wong, Frank Hoentjen and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Brendan P HalloranDirector of the Small Endoscopy Bowel Program, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, 130 University Campus NW, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G2X8.
Matthew ReesonDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5036-6604
Christopher TeshimaDivision of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Karen KroekerDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Vivian HuangDivision of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Levinus DielemanDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Peter HolmesDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Daniel C BaumgartDivision of Gastroenterology.
Karen WongDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Frank HoentjenDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Farhad PeeraniDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Sergio Zepeda-GomezDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
University of Alberta · CACharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEMount Sinai Hospital · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite recent emerging literature involving the utility of endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) of strictures Objectives: This study assesses the intra-procedural success and safety of EBD Design: Retrospective consecutive patient cohort analysis. Methods: We retrospectively assessed a consecutive small bowel CD patient cohort undergoing BAE at the University of Alberta Hospital endoscopy unit from 2013 to 2020. The primary endpoint discerned the safety and immediate success rate of EBD during endoscopy, and comparisons of the dilation parameters and efficacy of SBE Results: During the study period, 87 patients (44 male) with a mean age of 56 ± 14.7 years underwent 179 endoscopic procedures (92 DBE and 87 SBE). Of 358 strictures encountered, 320 (89.4%) were successfully dilated and traversed. The mean maximum dilation diameter was 15.76 ± 2.10 mm. There were no perforations or major adverse events. Conclusion: EBD

Indexed as

balloon-assistedCrohn’s diseaseendoscopysmall bowelstricture dilation

Identifiers

PMID38425369
PMCPMC10903206
OpenAlexW4392250424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.