Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38425364›Full record

ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024

Knee Flexion Angle of Fixation During Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction or Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Lateral Extra-articular Reinforcement Techniques Performed in Conjunction With ACL Reconstruction.

David A Kolin, John Apostolakos, Peter D Fabricant, Bridget Jivanelli, SATURN Study Group, Yi-Meng Yen, Dennis E Kramer, Mininder S Kocher, Andrew Tennant Pennock, Jeffrey J Nepple and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

David A KolinHospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
John ApostolakosHospital for Special Surgery New York, New York, USA.
Peter D FabricantHospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Bridget JivanelliHospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
SATURN Study Group
Yi-Meng YenBoston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Dennis E KramerBoston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mininder S KocherBoston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Andrew Tennant PennockRady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California, USA.
Jeffrey J NeppleWashington University Medical Center, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Samuel Clifton WillimonChildren's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Crystal Ann PerkinsChildren's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Henry Bone EllisScottish Rite for Children, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Philip L WilsonScottish Rite for Children, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Michael McClincyUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
James Everett VoosUniversity Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
David D SpenceCampbell Clinic Orthopaedics, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Benton E HeyworthBoston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) or lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is being used more frequently in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, the knee flexion angle at which fixation of ALLR or LET is performed during the procedure is quite variable based on existing technique descriptions. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to identify whether flexion angle at the time of ALLR/LET fixation affected postoperative outcomes in a clinical population. It was hypothesized that ALLR/LET fixation at low versus high flexion angles would lead to no statistically significant differences in patient-reported outcome measures and graft failure rates. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to identify published clinical studies of ACLR with ALLR/LET in which the knee flexion angle at the time of ALLR/LET was reported. A priori, low flexion was defined as 0° to 30°, and high flexion was defined as 60° to 90°. Studies were excluded if the flexion angle was between 31° and 59° because these angles constituted neither low nor high flexion angles and including them in an analysis of high versus low flexion angle at fixation would have biased the study results toward the null. The overall risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The pooled results of the studies were analyzed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and Tegner scores, along with reported graft failure rates. Results: A total of 32 clinical studies (5230 patients) met inclusion criteria: 22 studies (1999 patients) in the low-flexion group and 10 studies (3231 patients) in the high-flexion group. The median Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score was 6. Comparisons of patients with a low flexion angle versus a high flexion angle demonstrated no differences in the IKDC ( Conclusion: The results of this review indicated that ACLR performed in conjunction with ALLR/LET provides good to excellent patient-reported outcomes and low graft failure rates when ALLR/LET fixation is performed in either low or high knee flexion.

Indexed as

anterior cruciate ligamentanterolateral ligament reconstructionflexion anglegraft failurelateral extra-articular tenodesispatient-reported outcomes

Identifiers

PMID38425364
PMCPMC10903213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.