Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38425326›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Mapping the Evolution of Clinical Trials on Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Bibliometric Overview (1965-2023).

Namrata Dagli, Mainul Haque, Santosh Kumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Namrata DagliKarnavati Scientific Research Center, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, IND.
Mainul HaqueKarnavati Scientific Research Center, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, IND.
Santosh KumarDepartment of Periodontology and Implantology, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive overview of the current landscape in drug-resistant tuberculosis research. An extensive electronic search was conducted on PubMed and Scopus databases to identify clinical trials related to drug-resistant tuberculosis. Network analysis and visualization were performed on the data using the Biblioshiny App and VOSviewer software. This bibliometric study focuses on revealing publication trends, leading contributors, key institutions, thematic focuses, and citation patterns. The analysis of research paper publications reveals a consistent upward trajectory over the years, characterized by periodic declines and subsequent surges. Noteworthy peaks in 2013 and 2010 are observed in Scopus and PubMed, respectively, followed by marked declines, particularly notable between 2021 and 2023. PubMed and Scopus data indicate that the United States and South Africa are the leading contributors. According to the PubMed and Scopus databases, the University of Cape Town and Stellenbosch University are the institutions that contribute the most. Keyword and thematic analyses underscore the primary research focuses on drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB), including drug combination therapy, microbiological analysis of sputum, therapeutic uses of antitubercular agents, drug resistance (DR), multidrug resistance (MDR), and

Indexed as

bibliometriccitation analysisclinical trialsdrug-resistantmultidrug-resistantmycobacteriumnetwork analysisnetwork visualizationoverlay visualizationtuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID38425326
PMCPMC10902607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.