Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38424821›Full record

ArticleJournal of breast imaging2021

Impact of COVID-19 on Breast Imaging Practice Operations and Recovery Efforts: A North American Study.

Katerina Dodelzon, Lars J Grimm, Khai Tran, Brian N Dontchos, Stamatia Destounis, Vandana Dialani, Basak Dogan, Emily Sonnenblick, Margarita Zuley, Hannah S Milch

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of breast imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Katerina DodelzonWeill Cornell at NewYork-Presbyterian, Department of Radiology, New York, NYUSA.ORCID 0000-0001-9138-4385
Lars J GrimmDuke University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3865-3352
Khai TranSutterHealth, Breast Imaging Division, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Brian N DontchosMassachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2779-2218
Stamatia DestounisElizabeth Wende Breast Care, Department of Radiology, Rochester, NY, USA.
Vandana DialaniBeth Israel Lahey Health, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA.
Basak DoganThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7024-093X
Emily SonnenblickIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Radiology, New York, NY, USA.
Margarita ZuleyUniversity of Pittsburgh, Department of Radiology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Hannah S MilchDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Department of Radiology, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Cornell University · USDuke Medical Center · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USLahey Medical Center · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USSutter Health · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast imaging facilities' operations and recovery efforts across North America.

methodsA survey on breast imaging facilities' operations and strategies for recovery during the COVID-19 pandemic was distributed to the membership of the Society of Breast Imaging and National Consortium of Breast Centers from June 4, 2020, to July 14, 2020. A descriptive summary of responses was performed. Comparisons were made between demographic variables of respondents and questions of interest using a Pearson chi-square test.

resultsThere were 473 survey respondents (response rate of 13%). The majority of respondents (70%; 332/473) reported 80%-100% breast imaging volume reduction, with 94% (447/473) reporting postponement of screening mammography. The majority of respondents (97%; 457/473) continued to perform biopsies. There were regional differences in safety measures taken for staff (P = 0.004), with practices in the West more likely reporting no changes in the work environment compared to other regions. The most common changes to patients' experience included spacing out of furniture in waiting rooms (94%; 445/473), limiting visitors (91%; 430/473), and spacing out appointments (83%). A significantly higher proportion of practices in the Northeast (95%; 104/109) initiated patient scheduling changes compared to other regions (P = 0.004).

conclusionCOVID-19 had an acute impact on breast imaging facilities. Although common national operational patterns emerged, geographic variability was notable in particular in recovery efforts. These findings may inform future best practices for delivering breast imaging care amid the ongoing and geographically shifting COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

breast imagingCOVID-19diagnostic breast imagingoperationsrecoveryscreening

Identifiers

PMID38424821
PMCPMC7928933
OpenAlexW3121355377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.