Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38424573›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2024

Blood-feeding patterns of Culex pipiens biotype pipiens and pipiens/molestus hybrids in relation to avian community composition in urban habitats.

Rody Blom, Louie Krol, Melissa Langezaal, Maarten Schrama, Krijn B Trimbos, Daan Wassenaar, Constantianus J M Koenraadt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rody BlomLaboratory of Entomology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands. rody.blom@wur.nl.
Louie KrolInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Melissa LangezaalInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Maarten SchramaInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Krijn B TrimbosInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Daan WassenaarInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Constantianus J M KoenraadtLaboratory of Entomology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek NWA.1160.1S.210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCulex pipiens sensu stricto (s.s.) is considered the primary vector of Usutu virus and West Nile virus, and consists of two morphologically identical but behaviourally distinct biotypes (Cx. pipiens biotype pipiens and Cx. pipiens biotype molestus) and their hybrids. Both biotypes are expected to differ in their feeding behaviour, and pipiens/molestus hybrids are presumed to display intermediate feeding behaviour. However, the evidence for distinct feeding patterns is scarce, and to date no studies have related differences in feeding patterns to differences in host abundance.

methodsMosquitoes were collected using CO

resultsWe selected 64 blood-engorged Cx. pipiens/torrentium mosquitoes of which we successfully determined the host origin of 55 specimens. Of these, 38 belonged to biotype pipiens, 14 were pipiens/molestus hybrids and the identity of three specimens could not be determined. No blood-engorged biotype molestus or Cx. torrentium specimens were collected. We observed no differences in feeding patterns between biotype pipiens and pipiens/molestus hybrids across different habitats. Avian community composition differed between city parks and residential areas, whereas overall avian abundance did not differ between the two habitat types.

conclusionsOur results show the following: (1) Cx. pipiens s.s. feeding patterns did not differ between city parks and residential areas, regardless of whether individuals were identified as biotype pipiens or pipiens/molestus hybrids. (2) We detected differences in host availability between city parks and residential areas. (3) We show that in both urban habitat types, biotype pipiens and pipiens/molestus hybrids fed on both mammalian and avian hosts. This underscores the potential role in arbovirus transmission of biotype pipiens and pipiens/molestus hybrids.

Indexed as

CulexCulicidaeAnimalsEcosystemFeeding BehaviorHumansMammalsMosquito VectorsBlood mealHost-feedingLand useMosquito

Identifiers

PMID38424573
PMCPMC10902945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.