Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38424562›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2024

Prevalence of computer vision syndrome during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Darwin A León-Figueroa, Joshuan J Barboza, Abdelmonem Siddiq, Ranjit Sah, Mario J Valladares-Garrido, Suraj Adhikari, Edwin Aguirre-Milachay, Sanjit Sah, Alfonso J Rodriguez-Morales

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Darwin A León-FigueroaFacultad de Medicina Humana, Universidad de San Martín de Porres, Chiclayo, 15011, Peru.
Joshuan J BarbozaUnidad de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Meta-Análisis, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Juan del Corral 937. El Bosque, Trujillo, Lima, Peru.
Abdelmonem SiddiqFaculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.
Ranjit SahDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, 44600, Nepal.
Mario J Valladares-GarridoUniversidad Continental, Lima, 15046, Peru. mvalladares@continental.edu.pe.
Suraj AdhikariManipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal.
Edwin Aguirre-MilachayFacultad de Medicina Humana, Universidad de San Martín de Porres, Chiclayo, 15011, Peru.
Sanjit SahResearch Scientist, Global Consortium for Public Health and Research, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, 442001, India.
Alfonso J Rodriguez-MoralesMaster of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima, 15067, Peru.
Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College · INLebanese American University · LBManipal College of Medical Sciences · NPMansoura University · EGTribhuvan University Teaching Hospital · NPUniversidad Continental · PEUniversidad de San Martín de Porres · PEUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia · PEUniversidad San Ignacio de Loyola · PE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComputer vision syndrome has become a significant public health problem, especially in developing countries. Therefore, this study aims to identify the prevalence of computer vision syndrome during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was conducted using the databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase up to February 22, 2023, using the search terms "Computer Vision Syndrome" and "COVID-19". Three authors independently performed study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction, and the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument was used to evaluate study quality. Heterogeneity was assessed using the statistical test I

resultsA total of 192 studies were retrieved, of which 18 were included in the final meta-analysis. The total sample included 10,337 participants from 12 countries. The combined prevalence of computer vision syndrome was 74% (95% CI: 66, 81). Subgroup analysis based on country revealed a higher prevalence of computer vision syndrome in Pakistan (99%, 95% CI: 97, 100) and a lower prevalence in Turkey (48%, 95% CI: 44, 52). In addition, subgroup analysis based on study subjects showed a prevalence of 82% (95% CI: 74, 89) for computer vision syndrome in non-students and 70% (95% CI: 60, 80) among students.

conclusionAccording to the study, 74% of the participants experienced computer vision syndrome during the COVID-19 pandemic. Given this finding, it is essential to implement preventive and therapeutic measures to reduce the risk of developing computer vision syndrome and improve the quality of life of those affected.

trial registrationThe protocol for this systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in the international registry of systematic reviews, the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), with registration number CRD42022345965.

Indexed as

COVID-19Vision DisordersHumansPandemicsPrevalenceResearch DesignAnd PandemicComputer Vision SyndromeCOVID-19PrevalenceSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38424562
PMCPMC10902934
OpenAlexW4392288756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.