Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38424538›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2024

Costs of distributing HIV self-testing kits in Eswatini through community and workplace models.

Kathleen McGee, Marc d'Elbée, Ralitza Dekova, Linda A Sande, Lenhle Dube, Sanele Masuku, Makhosazana Dlamini, Collin Mangenah, Lawrence Mwenge, Cheryl Johnson and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kathleen McGeeFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. kat.v.mcgee@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5054-977X
Marc d'ElbéeFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Ralitza DekovaPopulation Services International, Mbabane, Eswatini.
Linda A SandeMalawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Lenhle DubeMinistry of Health, Mbabane, Eswatini.
Sanele MasukuPopulation Services International, Mbabane, Eswatini.
Makhosazana DlaminiPopulation Services International, Mbabane, Eswatini.
Collin MangenahCentre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Lawrence MwengeZambart, Lusaka, Zambia.
Cheryl JohnsonWorld Health Organisation, Global HIV, Hepatitis and STI Programmes, Geneva, Switzerland.
Karin HatzoldPopulation Services International, Cape Town, South Africa.
Melissa NeumanFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Gesine Meyer-RathCenter for Global Heath and Development, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, USA.
Fern Terris-PrestholtFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study evaluates the implementation and running costs of an HIV self-testing (HIVST) distribution program in Eswatini. HIVST kits were delivered through community-based and workplace models using primary and secondary distribution. Primary clients could self-test onsite or offsite. This study presents total running economic costs of kit distribution per model between April 2019 and March 2020, and estimates average cost per HIVST kit distributed, per client self-tested, per client self-tested reactive, per client confirmed positive, and per client initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART).

methodsDistribution data and follow-up phone interviews were analysed to estimate implementation outcomes. Results were presented for each step of the care cascade using best-case and worst-case scenarios. A top-down incremental cost-analysis was conducted from the provider perspective using project expenditures. Sensitivity and scenario analyses explored effects of economic and epidemiological parameters on average costs.

resultsNineteen thousand one hundred fifty-five HIVST kits were distributed to 13,031 individuals over a 12-month period, averaging 1.5 kits per recipient. 83% and 17% of kits were distributed via the community and workplace models, respectively. Clients reached via the workplace model were less likely to opt for onsite testing than clients in the community model (8% vs 29%). 6% of onsite workplace testers tested reactive compared to 2% of onsite community testers. Best-case scenario estimated 17,458 (91%) clients self-tested, 633 (4%) received reactive-test results, 606 (96%) linked to confirmatory testing, and 505 (83%) initiated ART. Personnel and HIVST kits represented 60% and 32% of total costs, respectively. Average costs were: per kit distributed US$17.23, per client tested US$18.91, per client with a reactive test US$521.54, per client confirmed positive US$550.83, and per client initiating ART US$708.60. Lower rates for testing, reactivity, and linkage to care in the worst-case scenario resulted in higher average costs along the treatment cascade.

conclusionThis study fills a significant evidence gap regarding costs of HIVST provision along the client care cascade in Eswatini. Workplace and community-based distribution of HIVST accompanied with effective linkage to care strategies can support countries to reach cascade objectives.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSelf-TestingDelivery of Health CareEswatiniHumansMass ScreeningWorkplaceCommunityCosts and cost analysisEswatiniHIVHIV self-testingWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID38424538
PMCPMC10902928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.