ArticleClinical proteomics2024
Highly sensitive therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab in serum by targeted mass spectrometry in comparison to ELISA data.
Article in Clinical proteomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biopharmaceutical analysis - current analytical challenges, limitations, and perspectives.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Platelet-Rich Plasma and Electrochemical Biosensors: A Novel Approach to Ovarian Function Evaluation and Diagnostics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Proteomic Profiling Towards a Better Understanding of Genetic Based Muscular Diseases: The Current Picture and a Look to the Future.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Challenges and Insights in Absolute Quantification of Recombinant Therapeutic Antibodies by Mass Spectrometry: An Introductory Review.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPresently, antibody concentration measurements for patients undergoing treatment are predominantly determined by ELISA, which still comes with known disadvantages. Therefore, our aim was to establish a targeted mass-spectrometric assay enabling the reproducible absolute quantification of peptides from the hypervariable and interaction regions of infliximab.
methodsPeptides of infliximab were measured post-trypsin digestion and subsequent separation on a Vanquish Horizon UHPLC coupled to a TSQ Altis Triple-Quad mass spectrometer. Normalization and absolute quantification were conducted using stable isotope-synthesized peptides. Calibration curves covering a range of 0.25-50 µg/ml were employed for quantitation.
resultsWe demonstrated the substantial influence of peptide selection, choice of hydrolase for digestion, and digestion time on absolute peptide yield (28-44% for peptide 1 and 64-97% for peptide 2). Furthermore, we showed that the generated calibration curves for absolute quantification were highly reproducible and robust (LLOQ1 0.72 µg/ml and LLOQ2 1.00 µg/ml) over several months. In comparison to ELISA values, the absolute values obtained by mass spectrometry often yielded lower results for both targeted peptides.
conclusionsIn this study, a semi-automated workflow was employed and tested with 8 patients and corresponding replicates (n = 3-4). We demonstrated the robust implementation of calibration curves for the absolute quantification of infliximab in patient samples, with coefficients of variation ranging from 0.5 to 9%. Taken together, we have developed a platform enabling the rapid (2 days of sample preparation and 30 min of measurement time per sample) and robust quantification of Infliximab antibody concentration in patients. The use of mass spectrometry also facilitates the straightforward expansion of the method to include additional antibody peptides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.