Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38424496›Full record

ArticleClinical proteomics2024

Highly sensitive therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab in serum by targeted mass spectrometry in comparison to ELISA data.

Andreas Hentschel, Gina Piontek, Rob Dahlmann, Peter Findeisen, Roman Sakson, Phil Carbow, Thomas Renné, Yvonne Reinders, Albert Sickmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical proteomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Andreas HentschelLeibniz-Institut für Analytische Wissenschaften-ISAS-e.V., Dortmund, Germany.
Gina PiontekLeibniz-Institut für Analytische Wissenschaften-ISAS-e.V., Dortmund, Germany.
Rob DahlmannLeibniz-Institut für Analytische Wissenschaften-ISAS-e.V., Dortmund, Germany.
Peter FindeisenMVZ Labor Dr. Limbach & Kollegen, Heidelberg, Germany.
Roman SaksonLeibniz-Institut für Analytische Wissenschaften-ISAS-e.V., Dortmund, Germany.
Phil CarbowLeibniz-Institut für Analytische Wissenschaften-ISAS-e.V., Dortmund, Germany.
Thomas RennéInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Yvonne ReindersLeibniz-Institut für Analytische Wissenschaften-ISAS-e.V., Dortmund, Germany. yvonne.reinders@isas.de.
Albert SickmannLeibniz-Institut für Analytische Wissenschaften-ISAS-e.V., Dortmund, Germany. albert.sickmann@isas.de.
Leibniz Institute for Analytical Sciences - ISAS · DERuhr University Bochum · DEUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPresently, antibody concentration measurements for patients undergoing treatment are predominantly determined by ELISA, which still comes with known disadvantages. Therefore, our aim was to establish a targeted mass-spectrometric assay enabling the reproducible absolute quantification of peptides from the hypervariable and interaction regions of infliximab.

methodsPeptides of infliximab were measured post-trypsin digestion and subsequent separation on a Vanquish Horizon UHPLC coupled to a TSQ Altis Triple-Quad mass spectrometer. Normalization and absolute quantification were conducted using stable isotope-synthesized peptides. Calibration curves covering a range of 0.25-50 µg/ml were employed for quantitation.

resultsWe demonstrated the substantial influence of peptide selection, choice of hydrolase for digestion, and digestion time on absolute peptide yield (28-44% for peptide 1 and 64-97% for peptide 2). Furthermore, we showed that the generated calibration curves for absolute quantification were highly reproducible and robust (LLOQ1 0.72 µg/ml and LLOQ2 1.00 µg/ml) over several months. In comparison to ELISA values, the absolute values obtained by mass spectrometry often yielded lower results for both targeted peptides.

conclusionsIn this study, a semi-automated workflow was employed and tested with 8 patients and corresponding replicates (n = 3-4). We demonstrated the robust implementation of calibration curves for the absolute quantification of infliximab in patient samples, with coefficients of variation ranging from 0.5 to 9%. Taken together, we have developed a platform enabling the rapid (2 days of sample preparation and 30 min of measurement time per sample) and robust quantification of Infliximab antibody concentration in patients. The use of mass spectrometry also facilitates the straightforward expansion of the method to include additional antibody peptides.

Indexed as

Absolute quantificationInfliximabMass spectrometryTDM

Identifiers

PMID38424496
PMCPMC10905900
OpenAlexW4392297658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.