Observational studyBMC pediatrics2024
Individualized estimation of arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure using machine learning in children receiving mechanical ventilation.
Observational study in BMC pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From scores to signals: evolution and innovations in pediatric early warning systems.Acute and critical care · 2026Article
- Correction: Individualized estimation of arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure using machine learning in children receiving mechanical ventilation.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMeasuring arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO
methodsThis retrospective observational study included pediatric patients (< 18 years) admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary children's hospital and received mechanical ventilation between January 2021 and June 2022. Clinical information, including mechanical ventilation parameters and laboratory test results, was used for machine learning. Linear regression, multilayer perceptron, and extreme gradient boosting were implemented. The dataset was divided into 7:3 ratios for training and testing. Model performance was assessed using the R
resultsWe analyzed total 2,427 measurements from 32 patients. The median (interquartile range) age was 16 (12-19.5) months, and 74.1% were female. The PaCO2 and EtCO2 were 63 (50-83) mmHg and 43 (35-54) mmHg, respectively. A significant discrepancy of 19 (12-31) mmHg existed between EtCO
conclusionsWe developed machine learning models to non-invasively estimate PaCO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.