ReviewCurrent drug safety2025
Perils and Problems in Bispecific T-Cell Engager Antibodies.
Review in Current drug safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A bispecific anti-MUC16/anti-death receptor 5 antibody achieves effective and tumor-selective death receptor 5-mediated tumor regression.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advances in cancer immunotherapy: Strategies and innovations strategies for adoptive immunotherapy of cancer.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2025Review
- Cancer Stem Cells Decide the Fate of Cancer Immunotherapy by Remodeling Tumor Microenvironment.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) are promising immunotherapies for cancer treatment designed to engage both tumour and immune cells. However, their use is associated with potential toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurotoxicity, and on-target, off-tumour toxicity. CRS, characterized by cytokine release, is the most common, potentially life-threatening toxicity. Neurotoxicity presents as neurological symptoms and on-target, off-tumour toxicity damages healthy cells. Incidence and severity vary based on BsAb type, dose, patient factors, and tumor characteristics. For this study, articles pertaining to BsAb toxicity were searched on PubMed. Moreover, the management involves early recognition, dose modification, supportive care, and, in severe cases, immunosuppressive therapy or treatment discontinuation. Clinicians must carefully assess risks and benefits, considering individual patient profiles. Close monitoring and multidisciplinary collaboration are crucial for effective BsAb therapy. All in all, while toxicity is a concern, with vigilant management, BsAbs remain a valuable cancer treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.