Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38424317›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Hydraulic flow unit and rock types of the Asmari Formation, an application of flow zone index and fuzzy C-means clustering methods.

Seyedeh Hajar Eftekhari, Mahmoud Memariani, Zahra Maleki, Mohsen Aleali, Pooria Kianoush

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seyedeh Hajar EftekhariDepartment of Earth Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, 1477893855, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-2785-1548
Mahmoud MemarianiDepartment of Earth Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, 1477893855, Tehran, Iran. Mahmoud.memariani@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9998-6232
Zahra MalekiDepartment of Earth Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, 1477893855, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2028-7558
Mohsen AlealiDepartment of Earth Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, 1477893855, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9788-1419
Pooria KianoushDepartment of Petroleum and Mining Engineering, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8203-0585
Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch · IRNational Iranian Oil Company (Iran) · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rock types are the reservoir's most essential properties for special facies modeling in a defined range of porosity and permeability. This study used clustering techniques to identify rock types in 280 core samples from one of the wells drilled in the Asmari reservoir in the Mansouri field, SW Iran. Four hydraulic flow units (HFUs) were determined for studied data utilizing histogram analysis, normal probability analysis, and the sum of squared errors (SSE) statistical methods. Then, two flow zone index (FZI) and fuzzy c-means (FCM) clustering methods were used to determine the rock types in the given well according to the results obtained from the HFU continuity index acts in-depth. The FCM method, with a continuity number of 3.12, compared to the FZI, with a continuity number of 2.77, shows more continuity in depth. The relationship between permeability and porosity improved considerably by utilizing HFU techniques. This improvement is achieved using the FZI method study. Generally, all samples increased from 0.55 to 0.81 in the first HFU and finally to 0.94 in the fourth HFU. Similar flow properties in an HFU characterized the samples. In comparison, the correlation coefficients obtained in the FCM method are less than those in the general case of all HFUs. This study aims to determine the flowing fluid in the porous medium of the Asmari reservoir employing the c-mean fuzzy logic. Also, by determining the facies of the rock units, especially the siliceous-clastic facies and log data in the Asmari Formation, the third and fourth flow units have the highest reservoir quality and permeability. Results can be compared to determining HFU in nearby wellbores without cores.

Indexed as

Asmari reservoirFlow zone indexFuzzy c-meansHydraulic flow unitsMansouri fieldRock types

Identifiers

PMID38424317
PMCPMC10904754
OpenAlexW4392295957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.