ReviewNPJ digital medicine2024
Internet- and mobile-based psychological interventions for post-traumatic stress symptoms in youth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early-stage randomised controlled trial of therapist-supported online cognitive therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder in young people.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2025Trial
- Treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2026Review
- Adolescents' Preferences, Experiences, and Views of 2 Online Programs for Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2026Article
- Blended Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy With Compassion for Adolescents With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial in Northern Sweden.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Posttraumatic stress disorder from early childhood to late adolescence: a resilience-oriented approach to prevention, diagnosis, and clinical management.Discover mental health · 2026Review
- eHealth in the management of PTSD in children and adolescents: a scoping review.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Experiences with a guided trauma-focused internet- and mobile-based intervention: a qualitative study of youth's perspectives.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025Article
- Feasibility and acceptability of remote technologies for the treatment of trauma- and stressor-related disorders in adults: mixed-methods systematic review.BJPsych open · 2025Review
- Feasibility of a trauma-focused internet- and mobile-based intervention for youth with posttraumatic stress symptoms.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2024Article
- The Effectiveness of a Mobile Learning Environment in Improving Psychological Security in Blind Students.Scientifica · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychological interventions can help reduce posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) in youth, but many do not seek help. Internet- and mobile-based interventions (IMIs) show promise in expanding treatment options. However, the overall evidence on IMIs in reducing PTSS among youth remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the efficacy of IMIs in PTSS reduction for youth exposed to traumatic events. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in January 2023 including non-randomized and randomized-controlled trials (RCT) investigating the effects of IMIs on PTSS in youth aged ≤25 years. Six studies were identified with five providing data for the meta-analysis. The majority of studies included youth with different types of trauma irrespective of PTSS severity at baseline (k = 5). We found a small within-group effect in reducing PTSS from baseline to post-treatment (g = -0.39, 95% CrI: -0.67 to -0.11, k = 5; n = 558; 9 comparisons). No effect emerged when comparing the effect of IMIs to control conditions (g = 0.04; 95%-CrI: -0.52 to 0.6, k = 3; n = 768; k = 3; 4 comparisons). Heterogeneity was low between and within studies. All studies showed at least some concerns in terms of risk of bias. Current evidence does not conclusively support the overall efficacy of IMIs in addressing youth PTSS. This review revealed a scarcity of studies investigating IMIs for youth exposed to traumatic events, with most being feasibility studies rather than adequately powered RCTs and lacking a trauma focus. This underscores the demand for more high-quality research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.