Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38424103›Full record

ArticleScientific data2024

A large dataset of annotated incident reports on medication errors.

Zoie S Y Wong, Neil Waters, Jiaxing Liu, Shin Ushiro

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zoie S Y WongGraduate School of Public Health, St. Luke's International University, 3-6-2 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. zoiesywong@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4499-9779
Neil WatersGraduate School of Public Health, St. Luke's International University, 3-6-2 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3503-0640
Jiaxing LiuSchool of Statistics and Mathematics, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Nanhu Blvd, Wuhan, Hubei, 430073, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5184-4313
Shin UshiroDivision of Patient Safety, Kyushu University Hospital, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incident reports of medication errors are valuable learning resources for improving patient safety. However, pertinent information is often contained within unstructured free text, which prevents automated analysis and limits the usefulness of these data. Natural language processing can structure this free text automatically and retrieve relevant past incidents and learning materials, but to be able to do so requires a large, fully annotated and validated corpus of incident reports. We present a corpus of 58,658 machine-annotated incident reports of medication errors that can be used to advance the development of information extraction models and subsequent incident learning. We report the best F1-scores for the annotated dataset: 0.97 and 0.76 for named entity recognition and intention/factuality analysis, respectively, for the cross-validation exercise. Our dataset contains 478,175 named entities and differentiates between incident types by recognising discrepancies between what was intended and what actually occurred. We explain our annotation workflow and technical validation and provide access to the validation datasets and machine annotator for labelling future incident reports of medication errors.

Indexed as

Information Storage and RetrievalMedication ErrorsNatural Language Processing

Identifiers

PMID38424103
PMCPMC10904777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.