Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38423546›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2024

Safeguarding in practice: anticipating, minimising and mitigating risk in teenage pregnancy research in urban informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya.

Lilian Otiso, Rosie Steege, Inviolata Njoroge, Linet Okoth, Phil Tubb, Elizabeth Nyothach, Penelope A Phillips-Howard, Sally Theobald, Miriam Taegtmeyer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lilian OtisoLVCT Health, Nairobi, Kenya lilian.otiso@lvcthealth.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0164-154X
Rosie SteegeDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2120-649X
Inviolata NjorogeLVCT Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Linet OkothLVCT Health, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4272-4635
Phil TubbDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4838-5419
Elizabeth NyothachCGHR, KEMRI, Kisumu, Kenya.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0904-9081
Penelope A Phillips-HowardDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1018-116X
Sally TheobaldDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9053-211X
Miriam TaegtmeyerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5377-2536
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBLVCT Health · KEKenya Medical Research Institute · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Safeguarding challenges in global health research include sexual abuse and exploitation, physical and psychological abuse, financial exploitation and neglect. Intersecting individual identities (such as gender and age) shape vulnerability to risk. Adolescents, who are widely included in sexual and reproductive health research, may be particularly vulnerable. Sensitive topics like teenage pregnancy may lead to multiple risks. We explored potential safeguarding risks and mitigation strategies when studying teenage pregnancies in informal urban settlements in Nairobi, Kenya. Risk mapping was initiated by the research team that had prolonged engagement with adolescent girls and teen mothers. The team mapped potential safeguarding risks for both research participants and research staff due to, and unrelated to, the research activity. Mitigation measures were agreed for each risk. The draft risk map was validated by community members and coresearchers in a workshop. During implementation, safeguarding risks emerged across the risk map areas and are presented as case studies. Risks to the girls included intimate partner violence because of a phone provided by the study; male participants faced potential disclosure of their perceived criminal activity (impregnating teenage girls); and researchers faced psychological and physical risks due to the nature of the research. These cases shed further light on safeguarding as a key priority area for research ethics and implementation. Our experience illustrates the importance of mapping safeguarding risks and strengthening safeguarding measures throughout the research lifecycle. We recommend co-developing and continuously updating a safeguarding map to enhance safety, equity and trust between the participants, community and researchers.

Indexed as

Intimate Partner ViolencePregnancy in AdolescenceAdolescentFemaleGender IdentityHumansKenyaMalePregnancySexual BehaviorHealth services researchHealth systemsKenyaMaternal healthPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID38423546
PMCPMC10910648
OpenAlexW4392303258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.