Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38423300›Full record

ArticleAppetite2024

Does 'portion size' matter? Brain responses to food and non-food cues presented in varying amounts.

Bari A Fuchs, Alaina L Pearce, Barbara J Rolls, Stephen J Wilson, Emma Jane Rose, Charles F Geier, Kathleen L Keller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Appetite, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bari A FuchsDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Alaina L PearceDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Barbara J RollsDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Stephen J WilsonDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Emma Jane RoseDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Charles F GeierHuman Development and Family Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Kathleen L KellerDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA; Department of Food Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA. Electronic address: klk37@psu.edu.

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002014 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KRASCHNEWSKI, JENNIFER L. · 2016 to 2025
$33.7M
Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000127 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SINOWAY, LAWRENCE I · 2012 to 2015
$17.1M
Penn State Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002015 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI VAN SCOY, LAUREN JODI · 2016 to 2025
$7.8M
Brain Mechanisms of Overeating in ChildrenR01DK110060 · NIDDK · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI KELLER, KATHLEEN L · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
Characterizing resilience to food-cue induced overeating in childrenR01DK126050 · NIDDK · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI KELLER, KATHLEEN L · 2021 to 2024
$2.3M
Determining protective cognitive and eating behavior phenotypes for pediatric obesityF32DK122669 · NIDDK · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI PEARCE, ALAINA LUNDBERG · 2019 to 2021
$168k
Determining the Functional Brain Networks that Underlie Children’s Overeating and Adiposity GainF31DK131868 · NIDDK · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI FUCHS, BARI ALLISON · 2022 to 2023
$64k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002015NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000127NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002014NIDDK NIH HHS F31 DK131868NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK122669NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK110060NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK126050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Larger portions of food elicit greater intake than smaller portions of food, particularly when foods are high in energy density (kcal/g; ED). The neural mechanisms underlying this effect remain unclear. The present study used fMRI to assess brain activation to food (higher-ED, lower-ED) and non-food (office supplies) images presented in larger and smaller (i.e., age-appropriate) amounts in 61, 7-8-year-olds (29 male, 32 female) without obesity. Larger amounts of food increased activation in bilateral visual and right parahippocampal areas compared to smaller amounts; greater activation to food amount (larger > smaller) in this cluster was associated with smaller increases in food intake as portions increased. Activation to amount (larger > smaller) was stronger for food than office supplies in primary and secondary visual areas, but, for office supplies only, extended into bilateral parahippocampus, inferior parietal cortex, and additional visual areas (e.g., V7). Activation was greater for higher-vs. lower-ED food images in ventromedial prefrontal cortex for both larger and smaller amounts of food; however, this activation extended into left lateral orbital frontal cortex for smaller amounts only. Activation to food cues did not differ by familial risk for obesity. These results highlight potentially distinct neural pathways for encoding food energy content and quantity.

Indexed as

BrainCuesFemaleFoodHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleObesityPrefrontal CortexChildrenCue reactivityfMRIFood cuesPortion size

Identifiers

PMID38423300
PMCPMC10948287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.