Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38422383›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2024

Pairwise Additivity and Three-Body Contributions for Density Functional Theory-Based Protein-Ligand Interaction Energies.

Charlotte Armida Elisabeth Schulze, Mauricio Cafiero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Charlotte Armida Elisabeth SchulzeDepartment of Chemistry, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AP, U.K.
Mauricio CafieroDepartment of Chemistry, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AP, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-4895-1783

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prediction of protein-ligand binding energies is crucial in computer-assisted drug design. This property can be calculated in a straightforward fashion as the difference in the energies between a binding site-ligand complex and the separated binding site and ligand. Often, though, there is value in knowing how different amino acid residues in the protein binding site interact with the ligand. In this case, the interaction energy can be calculated as the sum of pairwise energies between each amino acid residue in the binding site and the ligand, and the sum of these energies is often equated with the total interaction energy. The validity of this pairwise additivity approximation can be assessed by experimental evidence, such as double-mutant cycles. In this work, we test the pairwise additivity approximation on the sulfotransferase-l-DOPA complex for 16 density functional theory (DFT) methods with varying degrees of exact (Hartree-Fock) exchange. Several "families" of functionals are studied, including BLYP, B3LYP, and CAM-B3LYP, as well as M06L, M06, and M062X. We also calculate the three-body contributions to interaction energy for the same DFT methods and assess when they are significant. We find that the amount of exact exchange or other nonlocal contributions has a direct influence on how closely the sum of pairwise energies approximates the total interaction energy. We also find that three-body interactions can be significant and that their significance can be predicted with good accuracy.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsProteinsDensity Functional TheoryLigandsPhysical PhenomenaAmino AcidsLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID38422383
PMCPMC10945476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.