ArticlePloS one2024
Efficacy, safety, and side effects of oliceridine in acute postoperative pain, a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tolerability of different doses of oliceridine versus traditional opioids in acute pain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- A comparison of the effects of oliceridine and sufentanil on the quality of recovery after hysteroscopic surgery: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Trial
- Estimation of EDDrug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
- Article
- Median effective dose and 95% effective dose of oliceridine combined with ciprofol for painless gastroscopy: a dose-finding study based on Dixon's up-and-down method.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Effects of oliceridine-based patient-controlled intravenous administration on postoperative pain and hemodynamic stability in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- Expecting medication misuse: a proactive approach to drug discovery to prevent fatal overdose.Future medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Overview and Prospects of the Clinical Application of Oliceridine.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This will be the first meta-analysis on the efficacy, safety, and side effects of oliceridine on postoperative pain. Our aim with this work is to evaluate the clinical utility of this relatively new substance in a broad postoperative context. Oliceridine is a new so-called bias opioid that is approved for severe pain requiring an opioid. Due to its biased agonism, it is said to have fewer side effects than conventional opioids. This systematic review and meta-analysis will analyze the efficacy, safety, and side effects of oliceridine compared to placebo or morphine in acute postoperative pain for up to 72 hours. In January 2024, an extensive search in various databases will be performed without restrictions for randomized controlled trials with at least single blinding. After data extraction, data will be pooled and meta-analytic calculations performed. A random-effects model will be used. Dichotomous data will be presented as risk ratio and continuous data as standardized mean difference. Dose-dependent side effects will be evaluated with meta-regression. Heterogeneity will be assessed via the Q statistic and prediction interval in case of a sufficient number of included studies. Publication bias will be examined using funnel plot and Duval and Tweedie's trim and fill method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.