ArticlePloS one2024
Pro-SMP finder-A systematic approach for discovering small membrane proteins in prokaryotes.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Prokaryotic chromosomes contain numerous small open reading frames (ORFs) of less than 200 bases. Since high-throughput proteomics methods often miss proteins containing fewer than 60 amino acids, it is difficult to decern if they encode proteins. Recent studies have revealed that many small proteins are membrane proteins with a single membrane-anchoring α-helix. As membrane anchoring or transmembrane motifs are accurately identifiable with high confidence using computational algorithms like Phobius and TMHMM, small membrane proteins (SMPS) can be predicted with high accuracy. This study employed a systematic approach, utilizing well-verified algorithms such as Orfipy, Phobius, and Blast to identify SMPs in prokaryotic organisms. Our main search parameters targeted candidate SMPs with an open reading frame between 60-180 nucleotides, a membrane-anchoring or transmembrane region 15 and 30 amino acids long, and sequence conservation among other microorganisms. Our findings indicate that each prokaryote possesses many SMPs, with some identified in the intergenic regions of currently annotated chromosomes. More extensively studied microorganisms, such as Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, have more SMPs identified in their genomes compared to less studied microorganisms, suggesting the possibility of undiscovered SMPs in less studied microorganisms. In this study, we describe the common SMPs identified across various microorganisms and explore their biological roles. We have also developed a software pipeline and an accompanying online interface for discovering SMPs (http://cs.indstate.edu/pro-smp-finder). This resource aims to assist researchers in identifying new SMPs encoded in microbial genomes of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.